Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is made up lie by the MSM. No one has been indicted for Collusion with Russia to interfere with our election. Guess what? No one will be because collusion is not illegal. It's not entirely ethical, but not illegal. The entire investigation is BS and was launched on a pack of lies that can't be substantiated in a court of law. It's all fruit from the poisonous tree.
I don't think I'd like being part of his "team" at all with the displayed propensity he's shown for not only throwing people under the bus, but driving the dang bus!
I don't think I'd like being part of his "team" at all with the displayed propensity he's shown for not only throwing people under the bus, but driving the dang bus!
It is made up lie by the MSM. No one has been indicted for Collusion with Russia to interfere with our election. Guess what? No one will be because collusion is not illegal. It's not entirely ethical, but not illegal. The entire investigation is BS and was launched on a pack of lies that can't be substantiated in a court of law. It's all fruit from the poisonous tree.
Is it me, or have we seen a distinct evolution in talking points? Starting with the classic "There was never any collusion" moving on to the now-defunct "There is no proof of any collusion" and ending with the current "Collusion isn't actually a crime"? I can hardly wait for the next one.
This is Trump's MO, when a claim is coming attack. Look at what he said about his sexual harassment accusers, he called them liars or said "he didn't because he could do better." Character attacks are nothing new for Trump.
Trump's attacks are straight out of the Roy Cohn, who was Trump's mentor, playbook. In other words if you are caught in a lie, deny it, and attack your accuser.
I am fairly certain that even a 1st year law student could understand the strategy behind discrediting a witness. This is only controversial for Trump haters.
Wrong. What is controversial are the lengths Trump went to in order to protect Flynn. Trump admitted that he knew that Flynn had lied to the FBI, and the vice-president, and yet he still tried to protect him.
He fired James Comey because he refused to drop the investigation into Flynn and Russia. Comey also told congress under oath that Trump asked him promise that he would be loyal to him/Trump, but Comey refused because it would have been unconstitutional.
I admit that there are a lot of Trump haters out there, but let's face it, Trump is an easy man to hate. He doesn't appear to have any moral compass at all, and he is, by any standard, the biggest liar ever to get his oversized backside into the oval office.
The question is Trump went to extraordinary lengths to protect Flynn, but why? when we all know that loyalty is a quality Trump doesn't possess. What does Flynn know.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
