Tommy Robinson - Knocks out threatening attacker (legal, activist, radical)

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by BentBow

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Xwb1ZhoDk


Threaten to kill me & my family, then raise your hand... Same thing is happening.

He throws a good right cross. Looks like a GI.

[Cheesesteak Cravings]

The black man was turned away from him.

That was a sucker punch.

The white guy should be charged with assault.

[burdell]

Originally Posted by No_Recess

What is with this gun obsession?

I don't know the point of this thread but it isn't guns.

Man A attacked Man B. That's a violation of the non-aggression principle. Man B defended himself.

What's the problem?

Funny how many people (rightfully) defend that principle yet have big problems when country A attacks country B and country B defends itself.

[Hrw-500]

Originally Posted by Cheesesteak Cravings

The black man was turned away from him.

That was a sucker punch.

The white guy should be charged with assault.

I wonder what if the roles was reversed?

Although I could guess the following reaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyu2jAD6sdo

[NigerianNightmare]

Good job for Tommy Robinson showing exhibit A, on what happens when crazies aren’t armed and threaten you, the crazy gets his head pushed on straight and can get the help he needs when he wakes up from his nap and Tommy doesn’t have to deal with the PTSD of shooting someone who is threatening him but is unarmed.

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by burdell

Funny how many people (rightfully) defend that principle yet have big problems when country A attacks country B and country B defends itself.

Countries are fictional.

[Salmonburgher]

Originally Posted by NLVgal

More glorification of violence. Great.

Self defense is not a glorification of violence. It is an act of personal sovereignty.

[Cheesesteak Cravings]

Originally Posted by Hrw-500

I wonder what if the roles was reversed?

Although I could guess the following reaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyu2jAD6sdo

If the role was reversed I would say this.

The white man was turned away from him.

That was a sucker punch.

The black guy should be charged with assault.

[Loveshiscountry]

Originally Posted by LeaveWI

Like Natalie469 said- he did it without a gun. I notice how you ignored her post

Because it had nothing to do with the OP. How hard is that to figure out when one is looking for the truth and doesn't have a childish agenda?

Since when does having a gun mean one can pull it out whenever one wants to? It's called being reasonable and responsible.

How about you try making a responsible, reasonable post?

A piece of filth threatens another human being and your response is what again?
Next!

[Loveshiscountry]

Originally Posted by burdell

Funny how many people (rightfully) defend that principle yet have big problems when country A attacks country B and country B defends itself.

Yep just like the how the muslims retaliated in Benghazi because America was giving their enemies weapons.