Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This pardon made abundant sense, especially given Hillary and her cronies haven't even been charged with a crime for her handling of classified data. The laws of the land need to apply to all or none, not just to the little guy.
This pardon made abundant sense, especially given Hillary and her cronies haven't even been charged with a crime for her handling of classified data. The laws of the land need to apply to all or none, not just to the little guy.
Sigh. So heres the deal, we've NEVER charged people for unintentionally doing thinks like Clinton did with no associated attempts to hide it or actual release of the data. NEVER. Theres always been some effort to hide it, or release it.
Whereas we HAVE charged people who did things like this guy did. The laws of the land were applied correctly. You may not agree with it. but thats the reality.
Sigh. So heres the deal, we've NEVER charged people for unintentionally doing thinks like Clinton did with no associated attempts to hide it or actual release of the data. NEVER. Theres always been some effort to hide it, or release it.
Whereas we HAVE charged people who did things like this guy did. The laws of the land were applied correctly. You may not agree with it. but thats the reality.
You think it was just an oversight that Hillary set up a server in her own home rather than use the State Depts? That she didn't know she wasn't supposed to do that? That making her files much less accessible wasn't intentional? That trying to delete them when they were to be preserved was accidental? That Anthony Weiner having Hillary's files on his laptop was a mistake? That having a housekeeper with no security clearance print out emails for Hillary was unintentional because Hillary didn't know high security matters were only for people with high security clearances?
You think it was just an oversight that Hillary set up a server in her own home rather than use the State Depts?
Probably habit to be honest. Some of us DO have our own email servers, and its especially handy as you can get a VERY easy to remember email address this way. And it allowed her to carry one device instead of two.
Quote:
That she didn't know she wasn't supposed to do that?
The law that changed it so that she shouldnt do it was made in 2014-after she left office.
Quote:
That making her files much less accessible wasn't intentional?
I dont know, I cant read her mind.
Quote:
That trying to delete them when they were to be preserved was accidental?
It was not ordered by her. Thats per a FBI investigation.
Quote:
That Anthony Weiner having Hillary's files on his laptop was a mistake?
They were emails sent by his wife - often on Clintons behalf. They were NOT Clintons emails.
Quote:
That having a housekeeper with no security clearance print out emails for Hillary was unintentional because Hillary didn't know high security matters were only for people with high security clearances?
Probably habit to be honest. Some of us DO have our own email servers, and its especially handy as you can get a VERY easy to remember email address this way. And it allowed her to carry one device instead of two.
The law that changed it so that she shouldnt do it was made in 2014-after she left office.
I dont know, I cant read her mind.
It was not ordered by her. Thats per a FBI investigation.
They were emails sent by his wife - often on Clintons behalf. They were NOT Clintons emails.
Sigh. So heres the deal, we've NEVER charged people for unintentionally doing thinks like Clinton did with no associated attempts to hide it or actual release of the data. NEVER. Theres always been some effort to hide it, or release it.
Whereas we HAVE charged people who did things like this guy did. The laws of the land were applied correctly. You may not agree with it. but thats the reality.
The laws were applied as written but someone like James Clapper can commit perjury, cause the country far more damage than this guy did and nothing happens.
Sigh. So heres the deal, we've NEVER charged people for unintentionally doing thinks like Clinton did with no associated attempts to hide it or actual release of the data. NEVER. Theres always been some effort to hide it, or release it.
Whereas we HAVE charged people who did things like this guy did. The laws of the land were applied correctly. You may not agree with it. but thats the reality.
lolololol unintentional lololololol. Yeah she unintentionally setup a server in her house. She unintentionally sent and received classified emails. She unintentionally deleted and wiped the server. She unintentionally smashed her phones with a hammer. She unintentionally lied to the FBI and Congress and hid some emails. You get the picture. There is no way you actually believe any of that, if you do something is very wrong.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
