Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
you forgot to include the fact that Kavanaugh was asked leading questions which required either a yes or no answer and that were politically motivated. Ford was not and was given the benefit of the doubt by democrats. Kavanaugh was presumed guilty by democrats.
And Ford's questions did not even dive into her activities during high school.
He didn't "grow a pair." He got desperate--and like guilty, lying men everywhere, he became belligerent.
This sentiment seems to be a recurring one for you. It's as though "guilty, lying" men are the only kind you know....or are you choosing to let the left populous do your thinking for you?
Fwiw, I am neither male nor Republican, and watching an entire demographic get continually maligned because of a few just reinforces the hypocrisy of the liberal agenda. What a sad commentary for all.
What the hell is there to "investigate" anyways. It was from 1982 for cripe sakes. All the "evidence" is gone. Theres not gonna be a blue dress laying around with Kavanaugh's spooge on it.
These liberals are too much today.
They aren't the sharpest tools in the shed. This may backfire on the Dems if the FBI finds that not only are the allegations bogus, but the allegations were scripted and managed by Dem operatives, polygraph and all.
Still waiting for an explanation of this contradiction... Ford made an interesting comment in her testimony on Thursday. She talked to "beach friends" ... "beach people" about what she should do about her supposed allegation. That, AFTER she claimed the only people she told about the incident were her husband and her therapist. Well... That's a BIG FAT LIE right there.
Quote:
Mitchell followed up by asking what motivated her to contact the Washington Post on July 6th, to which she replied that she was “panicking” and her beach friends urged her to call newspapers or her congresswoman.
There’s one major flaw in that argument – The Post itself reported that Ford had relayed those terrible memories “only in therapy and with her husband.”
If they were about to vote without any investigation at all, they will likely be fine with having given them a week to investigate. And past similar cases have been concluded within a week.
I thought you meant this coming Monday but at any rate why is this such a rush, better to get it right than push it through. Evidently this is within the realm of the FBI.
Asking "Are you willing to have the FBI investigate" 20 times in a row while cutting off Kavanaugh every time he tries to answer should count as one question instead of 20...lol.
He kept answering with, I'll go with whatever the committee decides, because he already knew full well the committee wasn't going to go that route. He was asked point blank many times, never mind about the committee, would YOU support an FBI investigation, and he continued to just parrot that same line about the committee. Until finally, when pressed, he sat there like an errant five year old and refused to answer at all.
Would you call that a forthright answer to the question that he was asked?
Maybe answering questions doesn't necessarily indicate truthfulness, but NOT answering sure does indicate a lack of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease
you forgot to include the fact that Kavanaugh was asked leading questions which required either a yes or no answer and that were politically motivated. Ford was not and was given the benefit of the doubt by democrats. Kavanaugh was presumed guilty by democrats.
How can I include something that didn't happen? It wasn't Kavanaugh who the GOP brought in a prosecutor to cross examine - in fact, they ended up stopping Mitchell from being the one to ask him questions. Or are you trying to suggest that all the GOP senators were completely without any political bias in their questions to him? Which is of course total nonsense.
I'm definitely irritated to Flake for caving and trying to be everyone's friend. He's going to find out, which I'm shocked he hasn't yet, that they aren't his friends. They're using him, just like they used Ford. Horrible politics at play here.
I think it was a savvy move by Flake. It gives the Dems and liberals what they have all publicly asked for (FBI investigation) but denies them what they really want (delay past elections).
And what if Ford refuses to cooperate or retake an FBI polygraph? Or major holes are found in her story?
How do these people get the support to run? Amazing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This may backfire on the Dems if the FBI finds that not only are the allegations bogus, but the allegations were scripted and managed by Dem operatives, polygraph and all.