Anonymous Trump insider writes oped in the NYT (legal, presidency, working)

[Texas Minded]

Originally Posted by FatBob96

So take your lumps in the unemployment line if it's that important to you.

Otherwise do the job that you signed up for and shut the Hell up.

If it's anonymous, it could be written by anyone claiming to be an "insider".

Stay tuned for my anonymous tell all book about how Huma Abidin is actually a gay space alien sent to hack the DNC.....

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Good one (knee slap)

[mountainrose]

Originally Posted by Cruithne

My bet is on General Mattis.


Should have had a poll attached to this thread.


It's not Kelly. He doesn't have the articulation to write that piece.

Why Mattis? Trump has given the military a lot, everything Mattis has asked for.

[jojajn]

When trump went on his rant in front of the
Sheriffs who were laughing at him, trump read from a news article of which he did not cite the source of.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

It was your alter ego that is trying to break free.

There is no way to twist it, to harm Trump in anyway.

[FatBob96]

Originally Posted by Cruithne

The content of your post is completely irrelevant to the news story.

Being unemployed is not going to help is it?

The POINT is that the writer is trying to protect the nation from Trump, which they can only do from WITHIN. Do try to keep up.

Do try to let your brain absorb the fact that there is no evidence that this was written by a "senior White House official".


That's the beauty of anonymity..... you can claim to be anyone you want.....


https://youtu.be/T-2_PXzzLJo

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease

deep state getting worried. journalistic new low. smells fishy and the pressure will be on to uncover the traitor. NY Times will lose for sure.

That is worded like a telegram from the early 1900's. Trump's supporters really are the regressive party.

[katzpaw]

Originally Posted by FatBob96

So take your lumps in the unemployment line if it's that important to you.

Otherwise do the job that you signed up for and shut the Hell up.

The are doing their job, protecting the country from a clear and present danger.

If it's anonymous, it could be written by anyone claiming to be an "insider"

The NYT knows who he is. He is not anonymous to the NYT and they would not have printed it if he was not high up.

[pbmaise]

But if this is Pence...could he sign his name?

How can the man who will become POTUS step forward without being accused of self-serving?

I think I know the answer to my own question. Pence would have to resign first. However, Pence won't resign because he thinks this is God's will. Or at least we are told Pence is a nutter.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by mountainrose

Why Mattis? Trump has given the military a lot, everything Mattis has asked for.

No one has noticed, Trump has surrounded himself with the Military.
The Military chose Trump over Hillary.

[mountainrose]

Originally Posted by Cruithne

Because they'd get fired and as they said in the piece, they are trying to protect the nation from Trump. Try reading the thing.

What’s fishy to me is — why the NYT then?
He is just preaching to the choir. If he is really a senior WH republican who is that worried, you’d
go to FOX, WSJ or a conservative outlet to let the people of consequence know, not a bunch of elitist liberals.