Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I say it is high time. What does he have to lose?! Build it and build it now. Steam roll over Democrats if they won’t cooperate. It’s really sad what the Democrats have become.
Democrats don't want to waste our money on a wall which wouldn't prevent anyone coming into the country. Why are we giving so much attention to this. How about we spend this money on our homeless vets who need jobs and a place to live. Or spend it for others who need help.
It's disappointing reading these kinds of comments when I have posted several links proving that the good walls do work. A physical barrier helps the Border Patrol do their jobs more effectively. From what I understand the military is not authorized to act as Border Patrol personnel.
There are those in the military that do know construction also.
The ignoramuses saying the wall won't work are basing it on nothing but strategic lies to attempt to discourage it from happening. I don't really care whether they think it will work or not. The people that know best - the agents actually on the border enforcing it - want the wall and say it will be an effective tool.
I see nothing wrong with his using the military but I do disagree with you (which is rare) I am just not convinced a wall will be much help.
What makes you more qualified than the vast majority of Border Patrol agents on what will or will not be effective in enforcing the border? They want the wall and say it will be effective.
Whatever you choose to call it, it is L E G A L.
It is the legal precedents for acquiring land the government needs for whatever purpose.
Bob.
Violation of property rights is never “legal.” The owners of any property the State wants to confiscate have the right to defend their property by any means necessary--up to and including deadly force.
“Legal precedents” don't mean a damn thing with regards to Natural Law.
I say it is high time. What does he have to lose?! Build it and build it now. Steam roll over Democrats if they won’t cooperate. It’s really sad what the Democrats have become.
And the Republicans are oh so perfect . This country is basically the psycho left attacking the whacky right. It's sad to see what the US Government has become would be a more realistic statement. And it's also sad to see the continued degradation of humanity.
And the Republicans are oh so perfect . This country is basically the psycho left attacking the whacky right. It's sad to see what the US Government has become would be a more realistic statement. And it's also sad to see the continued degradation of humanity.
Well said.
__________________ ____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Violation of property rights is never “legal.” The owners of any property the State wants to confiscate have the right to defend their property by any means necessary--up to and including deadly force.
“Legal precedents” don't mean a damn thing with regards to Natural Law.
I would suggest you not try using that argument in court. Word to the wise.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
. This country is basically the psycho left attacking the whacky right. It's sad to see what the US Government has become would be a more realistic statement. And it's also sad to see the continued degradation of humanity.
