Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-12-2018, 01:43 AM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,886,302 times
Reputation: 9117

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It's wrong for anyone to say "I need protection but you do not".
No it's wrong to say "I deserve protection, but you do not."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-12-2018, 01:44 AM
 
3,366 posts, read 1,607,603 times
Reputation: 1652
Quote:
Originally Posted by rstevens62 View Post
The easiest and most effective way, would be to go about conditioning/ brainwashing the owners of those guns into believing guns should only be in the hands of police or military.

This really does work, Ive seen gun buy backs or turn in stations pop up after mass shootings and many people interviewed y media, claim after this latest mass shooting, its enough for them, they do not want guns in their house anymore....See how easy it is to manipulate public opinion so it lines up with what a tyrannical govt wants? Very sneaky but very clever.
I've often taken issue with the term "buy back". These gov agencies did not produce or previously own these firearms , so the term itself is a manipulative falsehood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2018, 02:19 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You basically proved my point.

It takes a well organized terrorist organization and a military commander bombing building specialist to carry out that attack.

What is the likelihood that some loser from Antioch, Tennessee has that kind of support and connection?

.
Ask Eric Rudolph, Timothy McVeigh, Ted Kaczynski.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2018, 03:01 AM
 
Location: USA
31,086 posts, read 22,101,630 times
Reputation: 19101
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebeldor View Post
Yes--only cops should have guns. Especially so they can break into your apartment and shoot you dead for no reason.

Does Donald Trump deserve armed security?
The Left doesn't trust cops with guns either. Apparently cops are just out there to kill people, according to our local Leftist. No guns for the Public, no guns for the Popo. Maybe guns just for the Feds in their mind. But then they get their wish that only the Feds have guns, and now those Federal Police are controlled by Donald Trump
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2018, 03:46 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,233,828 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
Old news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2018, 04:57 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post

"Pro-gun people always think things would turn out better with more guns..."

Where do you go to come up with this junk?


I am pro-gun and DON'T believe "think things would turn out better with more guns..."

You did NOT ask me so, how do you come with "people always think", when you haven't asked EVERYONE of us?


Thread FAIL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2018, 09:56 AM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,612,875 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo302 View Post
I've often taken issue with the term "buy back". These gov agencies did not produce or previously own these firearms , so the term itself is a manipulative falsehood.
I only used 'gun buy backs' because I wasnt sure what else to call them, it was basically a line of citizens willing to turn over their guns, so they can be destroyed. Im assuming the ATF were the ones accepting the guns.

The point I was making though, was after a mass shooting happens, lots of people suddenly do not want guns in their house anymore...in other words, they have been successfully conditioned.

Thats how easy it would be to disarm majority of the citizens, why do it by force, when you can use psychology?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top