Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They're so excited in their desperation for any kind of news that might support their "The Russia investigation is a conspiracy by the Deep State" narrative.
There is nothing to suggest it is anything other than that. And now that you've heard it from the horse's mouth, that's still not enough for you.
Interesting that the liberals can rightly point out, mentioning Israel's lobbying influence in DC is not anti-Semitic, but then turn around & claim anyone who rightly points out what an obvious hoax this Russia narrative & the Mueller investigation are, is "doing Putin's bidding for him".
You misstate the situation when you use the term "coup" in your thread's title. McCabe and others discussed the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to the Constitution - quite legally and obviously constitutionally - because they were extremely concerned about Trump's fitness to be in office as the President of the United States. This is far different from a coup, which is an illegal overthrow of government, usually by force.
Try to understand the concept, that the FBI has no such power, charter or any such authority to do such things.
If a Democratic president was subject to the exact same thing by a rogue FBI, it would be considered 100 times more explosive than Watergate, due to constant MSM coverage and demands for charges to be brought against the rouge FBI agents.
Get a clue and read the Constitution, and the FBI charter to see the proper ways to deal with the removal of a president.
Here is a big hint, the FBI has no such power, nor should it, regardless of who is president.
I wanna know where the FBI investigation was when Obama said on National TV during his debate with Mitt Romney that the 1980's want their foreign policy back and Russia was not an enemy.
Try to understand the concept, that the FBI has no such power, charter or any such authority to do such things.
If a Democratic president was subject to the exact same thing by a rogue FBI, it would be considered 100 times more explosive than Watergate, due to constant MSM coverage and demands for charges to be brought against the rouge FBI agents.
Get a clue and read the Constitution, and the FBI charter to see the proper ways to deal with the removal of a president.
Here is a big hint, the FBI has no such power, nor should it, regardless of who is president.
`
I've come to the realization that most of these posters do not have the cognitive ability to understand even this simple example you posted. Some are full of political animus & don't care, but by & large, sadly, the others just have no clue.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
