Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What Barr released was a summary of the “principle conclusions”
Basically its just the outcome of the investigation, like looking at the final score of a baseball game rather than a play by play.
The democrats took that to mean a summary of the entire investigation..that was incorrect.
It wasnt a summary of the details leading up to outcome.
It wasnt a summary of methods that lead to the outcome.
It wasnt a summary of questions asked to witnesses.
It was just a summary of the final outcome
The report isnt going to change that final outcome , it is just going to allow people to see the details and how that outcome was reached.
At the end of day Barr is the AG and his decision is what counts and its still going to be no collusion, no obstruction, no conspiracy, no crime....and Trump will still be your president.
Lol
It was Barr's opionion/slant. He was appointed by Trump, remember? Trumps flunky that Sessions refused to be. Congress will decide if Trump is free from doing anything ethically wrong. Remember impeachment doesn't require an indictable offense Clinton for example)......
Mueller doesn't report to Congress, he reports to the AG. It was setup that way (to the AG) when the investigation began. Didn't hear any whimpering about it until you didn't like the findings.
Yea, well, everyone believed them on that Iraqi WMD thing, and well...
No matter how many times you repeat that lie, it is still a lie.
It was Cheney who cooked the WMD nonsense up, not the intelligence services.
The Intelligence services were refuting it. In fact, Cheney was behind outing an undercover intelligence agent because her husband wrote an opinion piece in the NYTs about how the yellow cake from Niger business was just BS.
Cheney hauled around a swarmy con man, Chalabi I believe his name was, to make his case. He and the neocons got were carrying on about mushroom clouds and so forth, not the intelligence services.
It was Barr's opionion/slant. He was appointed by Trump, remember? Trumps flunky that Sessions refused to be. Congress will decide if Trump is free from doing anything ethically wrong. Remember impeachment doesn't require an indictable offense Clinton for example)......
so now the new hoax is that Barr is lying about Mueller's report? LMAO
are you going to question Mueller also for not recommending impeachment and no more indictments? so the Dems in Congress will go over Mueller and Barr to impeach Trump? LMAO!!!!!!! good luck!
Clinton told others to lie under oath. That's call obstruction and is an indictable offense......try again.
No matter how many times you repeat that lie, it is still a lie.
It was Cheney who cooked the WMD nonsense up, not the intelligence services.
The Intelligence services were refuting it. In fact, Cheney was behind outing an undercover intelligence agent because her husband wrote an opinion piece in the NYTs about how the yellow cake from Niger business was just BS.
Cheney hauled around a swarmy con man, Chalabi I believe his name was, to make his case. He and the neocons got were carrying on about mushroom clouds and so forth, not the intelligence services.
Funny, Mueller as director of the FBI was pushing the WMD....So was the Director of the CIA and Powell.
Monday is the deadline to release the report to Congress. Wonder if Barr will do it.
nope! and what are the Dems going to do, arrest Barr? LOL
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.