Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:04 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,520,612 times
Reputation: 7472

Advertisements


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=hFPrbMmyMgs

Hume analyzes media coverage of the Mueller investigation

 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Homeless
17,717 posts, read 13,544,998 times
Reputation: 11994
Default Congress To Get Redacted Mueller Report By Mid-April, Attorney General Says.

Attorney General William Barr has told congressional leaders that he anticipates being able to give them a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on his investigation into Russia's interference with the 2016 presidential election by "by mid-April, if not sooner." Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for lawmakers to see the full report without redactions, though members of both parties have called for its public release.

On Friday, Barr sent a letter to chairmen of the House and Senate judiciary committees — Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. — with an updated timeline. Nadler and other Democrats had asked for a complete release by April 2, but Barr said it would a take little longer to make the necessary redactions to protect grand jury material, sources and methods, and ongoing investigations, a process that Mueller is assisting in.

https://www.npr.org/2019/03/29/70812...eral-barr-says

Guilty or not they should of released ALL of this report and no matter which party you belong too.
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:10 PM
 
1,893 posts, read 1,011,158 times
Reputation: 2089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellion1999 View Post
so now the new hoax is that Barr is lying about Mueller's report? LMAO
No hoax. Just common sense.
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,739,500 times
Reputation: 6594
How many people posting here are not effectively committed to the flat-Earther conspiracy for life? Rachel Maddow definitely is. How many will follow her insanity and perpetually buy into Russian collusion until the day they die?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XniFGl1VKxw
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:27 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,080,699 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
How many people posting here are not effectively committed to the flat-Earther conspiracy for life? Rachel Maddow definitely is. How many will follow her insanity and perpetually buy into Russian collusion until the day they die?
You are clearly willing to take the word of a confirmed serial liar and his hand-picked sycophant, a man who was put where he is for the expressed purpose of shielding the aforementioned confirmed serial liar from letting the whole truth about him come out.

Not all of us are quite so gullible.
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:35 PM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,585,685 times
Reputation: 16247
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
You are clearly willing to take the word of a confirmed serial liar and his hand-picked sycophant, a man who was put where he is for the expressed purpose of shielding the aforementioned confirmed serial liar from letting the whole truth about him come out.

Not all of us are quite so gullible.
Oh, the irony!
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,115 posts, read 9,028,155 times
Reputation: 18771
poor libs they'll get whatever Barr decides, they'll have to learn to like it....
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,739,500 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBMorgan View Post
It was Barr's opionion/slant. He was appointed by Trump, remember? Trumps flunky that Sessions refused to be. Congress will decide if Trump is free from doing anything ethically wrong. Remember impeachment doesn't require an indictable offense Clinton for example)......
You're forgetting that without any prompting from Barr or anyone else, Mueller said he found evidence of collusion and that no further indictments will be sought. That's Mueller's opinion. Mueller has every conceivable reason to want to find enough evidence to nail Donald Trump to the cross. He had unprecedented resources and latitude. If anything was going to be found by any investigation, Mueller's should have found something. He didn't.

What we have seen in the last two years is several dirty politicians getting caught doing what far too many politicians do: Engaging in illicit criminal activity. It just had absolutely nothing to do with Russian collusion. Since Mueller's mandate was only to look for Russian collusion, I have to assume that Mueller wanted to use charges against Flynn, Manafort and others to get them to cut a deal in exchange for ratting out Trump. Apparently there was nothing to rat on him for, cuz Manafort could have saved himself the threat of 20+ years in prison otherwise. I'll be very curious to see if the DOJ has the moral integrity to fully chase down the Manafort rabbit hole. He got caught in a conspiracy and money laundering scheme that all went down about 10 years before he worked for Trump. Tony Podesta was part of the same scheme. Will the DOJ investigate and toss him in prison as well, or will he get away with it because his brother was Hillary Clinton's campaign manager? Was John Podesta in on it too?

The Left, especially the Mainstream Media controlled by the Left and used by them as a propaganda apparatus but the farm on Russian collusion. That will probably cost them dearly in 2020. To be honest, this thing needs to blow up in the Democrats faces in a huge way. If it doesn't then whenever the Dem's regain the White House, the following is pretty much inevitable:

Person A: Oh so Democrat X won. They're the next president. So when does the investigation on them begin?
Person B: Investigation into what?
Person A: Who cares? We'll make something up!
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:42 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,080,699 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
Oh, the irony!
https://twitter.com/robreiner/status...81174529720320
 
Old 03-31-2019, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,739,500 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
You are clearly willing to take the word of a confirmed serial liar and his hand-picked sycophant, a man who was put where he is for the expressed purpose of shielding the aforementioned confirmed serial liar from letting the whole truth about him come out.

Not all of us are quite so gullible.
Russian-truthers and flat-Earth-truthers have a lot in common. Both will go to their graves believing in a tinfoil hat conspiracy, furious at the world around them for refusing to accept their truth.

I've never much liked Trump, but Russian collusion never made much sense to me, particularly the notion that Trump was a Russian agent. If Russia wanted to buy somebody running in 2016, everyone else running would have been vastly cheaper. Trump's loyalty -- if the loyalty of a multi-billionaire can be bought at all -- would have bankrupt the Russian government and collapsed the Russian economy. Like I already said, the Dems and the media working on their behalf bet the farm on Russian collusion and they're probably going to lose badly in 2020 for it.

By the way, confirmed serial liar is an excellent description of the vast majority of politicians, particularly the entire field of Democrats running for President in 2020. The only exception is Tulsi Gabbard, and she's getting ignored by the DNC candidate making machine. If there was something so terribly wrong or egregious, do you honestly think that Trump and Barr could stop it from coming out? Are you going to flip from, "Believe in Mueller!" to "Mueller is a filthy liar!" He said he found no evidence of collusion. Are you calling him a liar?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top