Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-29-2019, 01:43 PM
 
26,581 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
I understand that, but the reason for the retraction was that he mentioned Aaron Rich. To make Aaron Rich happy, he had to retract the part about his brother too.

corsi clearly states that he had no "independent factual knowledge" about either brother. the original claim was BS that got repeated in an echo chamber and forced retractions from most of those outlets.

 
Old 03-29-2019, 01:55 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,375,874 times
Reputation: 11376
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
corsi clearly states that he had no "independent factual knowledge" about either brother. the original claim was BS that got repeated in an echo chamber and forced retractions from most of those outlets.
That doesn't mean the claim was false. It just means Corsi didn't have "independent knowledge", i.e., he was repeating what someone else said, and when you get sued that ain't much of a defense. Seymour Hersh, however, said it *was* Seth Rich, and that fits the other facts as we know them.
 
Old 03-29-2019, 02:01 PM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,087,126 times
Reputation: 7852
This guy wins the internet for the week:

https://twitter.com/acnewsitics/stat...96404785451008
 
Old 03-29-2019, 02:17 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,514,296 times
Reputation: 7472
https://insider.foxnews.com/2019/03/...BayRsthqk4qtQE

'Totally, Profoundly Dishonest': Gingrich Slams Schiff for Continued Collusion Claims
 
Old 03-29-2019, 02:18 PM
 
26,581 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
Seymour Hersh, however, said it *was* Seth Rich,....

even hersh isn't standing by the claim:


https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/s...s-f9b2756123d3
 
Old 03-29-2019, 02:20 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,375,874 times
Reputation: 11376
That's not accurate. He doesn't want to get involved, but he never backed off what he said.
 
Old 03-29-2019, 02:39 PM
 
26,581 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7435
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
.....but he never backed off what he said.

“I hear gossip,” Hersh tells NPR on Monday. “[Butowsky] took two and two and made 45 out of it.
 
Old 03-29-2019, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Tulare County, Ca
1,570 posts, read 1,380,209 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/...fL3ByIBeVf00hA

The Late, Not-So-Great Mueller Investigation
By Victor Davis Hanson

March 26, 2019 6:30 AM

Victor Davis Hanson is always good with his perspective.

In the end, Mueller’s investigation really did prove to be a witch hunt, just as half the country came to conclude. It has probably forever ended the idea that a special prosecutor can be useful or fair. It has curtailed foreign-policy options and prevented the traditional American realist approach to Russia as a triangulating counterweight to China. It ruined the lives of innocents such as Carter Page and the reputations of dozens of others such as General Michael Flynn. It divided the country in its transparent violation of any sense of disinterested investigation and turned the idea of American jurisprudence into a version of the Soviets’ “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.” And now that it is over, we should not forget what it wrought and those who empowered it.

Ah, ye of almost the same name. Victor Davis Hanson is a great historian and writer. Always a pleasure to read his articles and this was one of his best. Thanks for posting it. Although he was teaching at CSUF back when I was attending, I never had the honor taking one of his classes...my loss. I'll bet they were really interesting.
 
Old 03-29-2019, 03:09 PM
 
18,453 posts, read 8,282,661 times
Reputation: 13778
Barr said that he and special counsel Mueller would redact information that falls into the following categories.

Material subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (6e) that cannot be made public.
Material the intelligence community identifies as potentially compromising sensitive sources and methods.
Material that could affect other ongoing matters, including those that the special counsel has referred to other Department offices.
Information that would unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties.

Although the President would have the right to assert privilege over certain parts of the report, he has stated publicly that he intends to defer to me, and, accordingly, there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review.
 
Old 03-29-2019, 03:30 PM
 
Location: 20 years from now
6,454 posts, read 7,011,512 times
Reputation: 4663
This is all a joke. it's a shame Barr is bending to any of this. Mueller and Barr are both congressionally approved. A summary of their conclusions should be good enough, especially if that's the way that is how this has always been conducted. if I were him, I wouldn't show the Dems jack. let them force the issue through the courts, I'm sure they wouldn't win.

But who didn't see this coming; the Dems are already setting up another trap. Once he releases the redacted report, they wn't get what they want...and the Dems will claim that there's "too much redaction" to create further doubt and then the debate will start over what qualifies as a redaction


They want to keep this circus running until the balloons are fully deflated.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top