Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is certainly plenty of information from the prior indictments and news coverage to believe that there was reason to believe crimes were committed. Just Trumps statements alone and the firing of Comey, connections to the Russians and the constant lies that delayed the completion of the investigation.
He probably will not be impeached or indicted but if you can read through that report and claim that the bin is empty you are being dishonest.
Report shows no connections to Russia and Trump at all.
What is does show is Russians worked with the DNC and Hillary to get dirt on Trump, this why Seth Rice was murdered to cover up the dems working with Russia and paying for the fake dossier. So there you have it, there was Russian collusion, by Obama, Hillary and the DNC.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., pushed back on impeachment talk after the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report Thursday.
“Based on what we've seen to date, going forward on impeachment is not worthwhile at this point,” Hoyer told CNN. “Very frankly, there is an election in 18 months, and the American people will make a judgment.”
Hoyer’s comments stand in contrast to those of some of his Democratic colleagues in Congress, who had called for President Trump’s impeachment even before the release Thursday of a redacted version of Mueller’s report into Russian influence in the 2016 elections. House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said Thursday that Mueller’s report was made “with the intent of providing Congress a roadmap” to investigate Trump for obstruction of justice.
Barr's statement that Trump's level of cooperation with the SP was "unprecedented" isn't holding up too well, you have to wonder if he was reading the same report.
Trump waved Executive Privilege. That's unprecedented & what the AG was pointing out. Come on....this stuff is not hard
Poor dems lose another one and now move onto lies.
Did you ever see Obama tell the truth? Not often.
Obama was caught many times lying and all he would say it you misread what I meant.
Move on this is over you lost. Time to investigate the real anti America treasonous traitors starting with Obama and going down his list of dirty people.
Obama is a treasonous traitor, that is very clear to see. Once the FISA warrants are released will his followers spin it into something else? Lets see because it will prove without any doubt Obama spied on many US citizens and a sitting President using a fake Russian paid for by Democrats dossier to steal our election and then remove a sitting President.
Sit down and watch the show.
Democrats have 1000s of sealed indictments coming their way soon, removing the small 35 seat majority in the house real quick.
This entire hoax was set up by Obama to cover up his illegal treasonous acts.
The Mueller report is done, over, nothing to see other then Obama and the dems worked with foreign agents to spy on and dig dirt on a candidate to influence our election. That is a crime folks, multiple crimes.
This is interesting. Mueller likes sealed indictments. Mueller Left Open the Door to Charging Trump After He Leaves Office
Quote:
“The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the president’s corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law,” they wrote. The special counsel’s rationale left the door open to the possibility that after Mr. Trump leaves office, prosecutors could re-examine the evidence Mr. Mueller gathered and charge the president. Attorney General William P. Barr tried to slam that door shut last month when he announced that in his view, the evidence did not support charging Mr. Trump regardless of any constitutional issues about charging sitting presidents.
The press conference is the dog and pony show for Trump and his fans.
The Mueller report is the dog and pony show for the left and other Trump haters.
Trying their best to weaponize this nothing burger report, based as it was on lies, false accusations, fabricated "evidence" and breaking numerous laws.Bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
The Mueller report is the dog and pony show for the left and other Trump haters.
Trying their best to weaponize this nothing burger report, based as it was on lies, false accusations, fabricated "evidence" and breaking numerous laws.Bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Poor libs are struggling today.
Make some up, its the democratic way of doing things.
In sum, the investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to the Campaign. In some instances, the Campaign was receptive to the offer, while in other instances the Campaign officials shied away. Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.
So whilst not actively coordinating there was acceptance of some help from a foreign agency during the Campaign. As the report states "the foreign contribution ban is not limited to contribution of money. It expressly prohibits "a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value"." (The emphasis is from the report, just differently formatted here.) So this is still pretty damning, as is the rest of the report.
The way I see it, the Special Counsel's Office had the power to "prosecute federal crimes arising from [its] investigation". However, they were aware that they could not indict a sitting President. So they assessed their evidence and purposefully "determined not to apply an approach that could potentially result in a judgement that the President committed crimes"; that way individuals may stand a much better chance of "effective prosecution in another jurisdiction". Thus the Office passed the not-so-subtle baton to Congress, where "there [exists] an adequate non-criminal alternative to prosecution."
Quote:
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgement, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgement. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgement. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
The report further acknowledges Congress' "authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Looks like Congress is gonna have their work cut out for them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
