Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Barr mentioned the Russian indictments but he failed to mention the indictments of folks associated with the president. Barr is acting as the president's lawyer rather than the country's highest law enforcement officer.
Just an oversight I'm sure along with his failure to indicate the president wasn't exonerated.
also of interest in barr's statement was the detail on russia passing the hacked emails to wikileaks. He indicated that receiving the emails was not a crime as long as they didn't assist in their acquisition.
Attorney General Eric Holder brushed off a question Thursday about when he might leave the administration. Instead, the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.
there sure are many computer lawyers here on CD. the dts remains and it will continue until bad orange man is no longer in office. any hopes of democrats in congress doing anything productive for the next several years is lost based on the reaction I'm seeing from the democrat politicians today. very disappointing as the country needs infrastructure and immigration legislation desperately.
Last edited by texan2yankee; 04-18-2019 at 08:58 AM..
Reason: add reference
Why is Barr using the president's talking points of "no collusion and spying"? Collusion is not a legal term. If Mueller and Rosenstein disagree with Barr on some points of obstruction, It will be interesting to see why Barr concluded no legal obstruction on 10 different episodes of obstruction.
Because that's how you people set up this scam! Are you serious?
If he can release highly classified information to Russian "diplomats" in the Oval Office, he can release this report. No problem.
Mueller said that did not happen. Just because the Media and the Democrats were constantly telling LIES to try and establish some sort of "collusion" doesn't mean any of these wild stories were true.
What part of Mueller says "there was NO Collusion and NO Conspiracy with Russians" do you not get???
Also of interest in Barr's statement was the detail on Russia passing the hacked emails to WikiLeaks. He indicated that receiving the emails was not a crime as long as they didn't assist in their acquisition.
Now why did he single out that aspect?
to educate geniuses like you that for the past 2 years have been spreading garbage on what is a crime and what is not. Obviously you didn't pass the quiz.
This redacted version of the Mueller report is sure to be contested. Congress will want to see what is under the redactions.
To court we go!
Did you even listen to what Barr said? He is going to give the unredacted (minus a few things that are to be protected BY LAW) to some members of various committees in the House.
So, not only was the report lightly redacted, not only did Mueller redact right along with Barr, not only is there no collusion, no obstruction, the whiny House Dems will get to see what they are legally allowed to see.
There is no "to court we go". It's time to face reality.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
