Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
My God, what outrageous liars. Why do we allow such idiots to continue to be in power? Are we simply too darned fearful of our own government to do anything about it?
I think part of the problem in this country are the liar enablers. They will gullibly fall hook, line, and sinker for anything that Bush and his allies say. So why should Bush tell the truth when it doesn't suit him?
Somethng like 30% of the public still approves of the way Bush/Cheney are running the government. I think most people are so busy and wrapped up in their own lives that they just don't have the energy or time to devote to paying attention to politics very often. They vote once every four years with the idea that those they elect will represent their interests and competently manage things.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
It is so funny to watch you sit here and justify that its ok to bomb a "suspected" place that MIGHT have WMDs, without ANY authorization from ANYONE, which was an imature, il-responsible not presidential, and could have led to a huge international incident, and then criticize someone else who had bi-partisan support to take actions that they took.
Everyone has their own sense of humor. What I find funny is your inabilkity to understand the difference between a targeted strike and a poorly planned full scale invasion occupation as well as the difference between "could have led to" and has led to.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNTT_Vacationer
All the Bush bashers and we have 16 pages and still not a clear reference/cite to a Bush lie! Ironically, the biggest lie is that Bush has lied to the American public; the evidence doesn't exist.
Somethng like 30% of the public still approves of the way Bush/Cheney are running the government. I think most people are so busy and wrapped up in their own lives that they just don't have the energy or time to devote to paying attention to politics very often. They vote once every four years with the idea that those they elect will represent their interests and competently manage things.
All the Bush bashers and we have 16 pages and still not a clear reference/cite to a Bush lie! Ironically, the biggest lie is that Bush has lied to the American public; the evidence doesn't exist.
btw, UN resolution 1441 was 15-0 which gave Iraq a final opportunity to comply with inspectors and the treaty signed after the Kuwait.
And, on top of this, not one person has listed a VALID rationality in Bush lying, but Clinton didnt.. considering the fact that they both used the same intelligence..
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
And, on top of this, not one person has listed a VALID rationality in Bush lying, but Clinton didnt.. considering the fact that they both used the same intelligence..
1) Please identify which Clinton you're whining about when you post, you're obvioius hatred of the entire clan makes it difficult to distinguish which one you're currently bashing
2) The rationale of Bush lying is the fact he intended to invade Iraq no matter what and used whatever he could, fact or fiction to promote his cause, mis-stating an IAEA Repooprt being a perfect example.
All the Bush bashers and we have 16 pages and still not a clear reference/cite to a Bush lie! Ironically, the biggest lie is that Bush has lied to the American public; the evidence doesn't exist.
btw, UN resolution 1441 was 15-0 which gave Iraq a final opportunity to comply with inspectors and the treaty signed after the Kuwait.
DUH DUH DUH I posted links....and the bushslaves refuse to acknowledge them...so whatcha gonna do? They say they're liberal sites so can't be telling the truth and refuse to google anything on their own becasue they're scared to death of the truth and cling to the other 29% of the population who still , after all this time and all the proof are still brainwashed into believing bush didn't lie.
Too funny. The first three links I clicked reported that:
- (CNN) 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former Iraqi military facility (CNN quoting a U.N. nuclear watchdog agency)
- One anti-Bush site that stated Bush's comment that Iraq was "six months away from developing nuclear capability" was wrong because the IAEA had said that "Iraq had been six to 24 months away from such capability."
- The third was an IAEA board finding noting "Iran's many failures and breaches of its obligations to comply" with its Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Safeguards Agreement."
So now we're at 17 pages and no reference to an actual Bush lie. But not a total waste as we have even more confirmation of the real lie; that is, that Bush lied.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
