Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why is voter registration important, this is a mass murderer.
No doubt about it that Republicans want to scapegoat Democrats for causing mass shootings when the shooter is a registered Democrat. Same goes for Democrats.
Again, you register with a party when you vote in their primary in Texas. That is what the shooter's party registration with the Democrats indicates. You can only vote in one primary.
Patrick Crusius voted with the Democrats the last time he voted in a primary, which given his age (21 - 7/27/98), had to be 2018, because he would have been too young to vote in the primary in Texas in 2016.
You provide a link proving that is wrong, if you can. You cannot do it, because what I have said here is correct.
No, it's not up to me to prove you wrong. You need to prove what you are posting.
I do not want to ban all firearms. But rather than argue that with you, lets address the issue that I raised. If we are to allow people to carry firearms wherever and whenever they want, that does increase the risk of harm to non armed people due to accidental discharge of a firearm if nothing else. So there's always been an implicit promise that the good guys would protect the unarmed. But now we are finding out that the advocates of open carry everywhere are saying "oh no..we only do this to protect our own family". Well, if that's the case then I see no benefit in allowing them to carry their guns everywhere they want.
In the El Paso and several other active shooter incidents, there were people trained and licensed with a concealed weapon. None of them discharged a weapon.
I don't believe in the implicit promise that the good guys would protect the unarmed. I only believe that the majority of the concealed weapon armed individuals would act to protect themselves (and family) which is apparent in the case of El Paso.
The fact that would one use it to protect their own family and themselves pretty much means that there is a personal benefit to being a licensed concealed weapon owner... your sentence counters itself... there is a benefit to carrying a weapon.. personal protection.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
