Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Republicans are doing their damndest to convince the less intelligent folks that Trump is being unfairly accused, though several have confirmed what the whistleblower reported, including Trump, Giuliani, and Ambassador Sondland.
It's a done deal at this point.
Rand Paul, Trump, and Republicans are now claiming that it is no fair that a whistleblower pointed out that Trump was violating the Constitution.
No they're not. That's just something you made up because you don't care about the truth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould
It's witness intimidation. An obvious attempt to scare others into silence.
Intimidate? Keep repeating what your handlers tell you.
An obvious attempt by GotHereQuickAsICould to deflect from the truth.
I honestly don't think the name of the whistle blower is important. We are way beyond that in the investigation. Trump is using the same playbook as he did with the Mueller report. Remember the Steele dossier? The Page/Strzok texts. The Mueller investigation was well under way with Trump's inner circle convicted and the playbook was all about look over there way in the past. It's a way to try and slow down the narrative and shift the focus away from what's really going on. Uranium One anyone? Live in the past, not in the present. Is it illegal to out a whistle blower? Easy enough to Google and find out. Had it been advantageous to Trump it would have leaked. Supposedly Hannity knows who it is. Do you honestly think Trump doesn't know the name?
Remember, this "whistle blower, heard it from a friend, who heard it from a friend... Heard it from another you been messing around......
We want to know who leaked. The "Whistle Blower" can keep his job.
I watched this hour and 20 minute speech earlier today and it was very clear, what Rand Paul was 'inciting' when he demanded the media release his name (he did say he knew who it was), so Im not sure why he didnt announce it right there on stage, Im sure Trump would have been drooling over him if he had!
Some on the other side are saying this was illegal and if any harm came to the whistleblower, trump, paul and even trump supporters could be held responsible.
Just curious what everyone thinks, was this illegal, or not?
Of course, it's not illegal. As for your second paragraph, those people are out of their minds.
Remember, this "whistle blower, heard it from a friend, who heard it from a friend... Heard it from another you been messing around......
We want to know who leaked. The "Whistle Blower" can keep his job.
Exactly. Why the deep state hasn't misled ya'll before why would they start now, right?
Of course, it's not illegal. As for your second paragraph, those people are out of their minds.
The law says a legit "whistle blower" cannot be terminated or reprimanded for spilling the beans. The law says nothing about identifying the person making the accusation.
People that have been accused, have a justifiable right to confront their accusers, in the good `ol USA. This ain't Soviet Russia, or Communist China.
Exactly. Why the deep state hasn't misled ya'll before why would they start now, right?
Is Sunderland deep state too? If that guy is the deep state then Trump is directing the deep state.
And how does Rudy fit into the Deep State stuff, he was running a shadow State Department with Trump?
And who are these two Ukrainian or Russian guys paying Rudy? Why are they also hanging with Trump and Trump Jr?
I have way more questions than answers at this time and all of them due to this administration's own actions, not some boogie man I never heard of.
Libs have been trying to pin ANYTHING on Trump since his election.
This whistleblower will eventually be revealed and questioned by the opposition, at which time he will be outed as a partisan hack under the direction of Adam Schiff and his story will fall apart.
The rats are scurrying.
So Rand Paul is now sucking up to Trump. So shameful. I am sure his father is shaking his head in disbelief. If Paul knows who the whistleblower is, then he needs to be a man a name him but he is too much of a coward and wants someone else to do it for him.
I watched this hour and 20 minute speech earlier today and it was very clear, what Rand Paul was 'inciting' when he demanded the media release his name (he did say he knew who it was), so Im not sure why he didnt announce it right there on stage, Im sure Trump would have been drooling over him if he had!
Some on the other side are saying this was illegal and if any harm came to the whistleblower, trump, paul and even trump supporters could be held responsible.
Just curious what everyone thinks, was this illegal, or not?
The person's identity is protected by federal law.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
