Rand paul amnd Trump calling for 'whistleblowers' name to be relesaed at Nove 4th rally (enemies, FBI)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Rand Paul throws away his libertarian views and goes full Trumpster.
Paul blocked a resolution protecting whistleblowers.
Rand Paul afraid of the people of Kentucky.
There's nothing libertarian about accepting anonymous allegations without giving the individual the right to face their accuser and have them publicly questioned.
As usual, Rand Paul is standing up for individual rights against the state and that makes collectivists angry.
Inspector General Act says that agency watchdogs “shall not, after receipt of a complaint or information from an employee, disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee".
Inspector General Act says that agency watchdogs “shall not, after receipt of a complaint or information from an employee, disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee".
Yeah, that means that the IG can't disclose the identity, it doesn't cover anyone else doing so. Anyone else that wants to blow the whistle on the "whistleblower" is free to do so.
Why did he ask Paul to ask the press to publish with no proof?
If Trump knew the name who told him?
It looks like a RICO case.
Just look at CityData. The whistleblower’s name has been out on this forum for a while now. I’m sure there are even thread titles with his name on it.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.[1]
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.[1]
I guess you glossed over the first 4 words of the Sixth Amendment. Meh - I’m sure the were totally superfluous anyway.
I guess you glossed over the first 4 words of the Sixth Amendment. Meh - I’m sure the were totally superfluous anyway.
It should still apply to impeachment proceedings, which is the same as a public trial.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
