Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Answer the million dollar question. Why is Trump's DOJ not investigating Biden? If Biden is so guilty, then do they not have the responsibility to investigate? And then if they were investigating it themselves, they could then use that treaty Bill Clinton signed to ask Ukraine for any evidence pro or con regarding Biden.
Since y'all are so sure Biden is guilty, where is the DOJ investigation? Admit that this is not about finding Biden guilty but keeping the spoiled man-child y'all foolishly elected in office so he can keep "trolling" li-bruhls.
The GOP does not care one iota about rule of law. They want to stay in power.
Been asking the same question many times, I don’t expect you will get an answer.
On Oct. 8, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone wrote a letter in response to a House subpoena informing the leaders of the inquiry that President Trump and members of his administration would not participate in the inquiry “under any circumstances.”
The White House refused to cooperate in the inquiry, blocking witness testimony and document turnover. Key individuals who refused to comply with the inquiry include Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought, and Rudy Giuliani. Other White House officials who have also refused to testify include National Security Council lawyers John Eisenberg and Michael Ellis; Mulvaney adviser Robert Blair; and Brian McCormack, the associate director for natural resources, energy, and science at the Office of Management and Budget. Additionally, as specified in the report, the White House, the Office of the Vice President, the Office of Management and Budget, the Department of State, the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy failed to produce any documents in response to “71 specific, individualized requests or demands for records in their possession, custody, or control.”
I would like this to end quickly but it it would be interesting if Trump got his wish for a trial with more witnesses. This is exactly why McConnell wants a quick vote and no further testimony.
On Oct. 8, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone wrote a letter in response to a House subpoena informing the leaders of the inquiry that President Trump and members of his administration would not participate in the inquiry “under any circumstances.”
The White House refused to cooperate in the inquiry, blocking witness testimony and document turnover. Key individuals who refused to comply with the inquiry include Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought, and Rudy Giuliani. Other White House officials who have also refused to testify include National Security Council lawyers John Eisenberg and Michael Ellis; Mulvaney adviser Robert Blair; and Brian McCormack, the associate director for natural resources, energy, and science at the Office of Management and Budget. Additionally, as specified in the report, the White House, the Office of the Vice President, the Office of Management and Budget, the Department of State, the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy failed to produce any documents in response to “71 specific, individualized requests or demands for records in their possession, custody, or control.”
As it is now SCOTUS has decided to rule on the question which is the way it should have gone. Article 2 of the impeachment is now mute.
No, because the house controls the impeachment. SCOTUS can look at the cases outside of the HOUSE and following the past (Nixon, Clinton) will give the financial Documents to Rep. Neal.
No, because the house controls the impeachment. SCOTUS can look at the cases outside of the HOUSE and following the past (Nixon, Clinton) will give the financial Documents to Rep. Neal.
Article 2 is going all the way.
Dude. It's done. The SCOTUS controls the question now. That is the way democracy and the 3 branches work.
Tantrums wont change that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
