Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think Trump should mock the process but we know what he is doing and why. He is playing to the audience, they love it and he loves it and he does it because he never gets a fair shake from the media.
Lets say that he do go to the House to ask their approval to strike Salami and they said no. What would he have done then? What if they put it to a committee and in the weeks they bicker about it weighing the politics of it that Salami guy hits the embassy again which results in American deaths? And this is a real sad kicker if he did go to the House to ask their permission there is a real chance that the strike would have been "leaked".
Voters are waking up and starting to question what side the Democrats are really on.
"He is playing to the audience", don't they ALL?
I recall hillary changing her accent based on who she was giving a speech to. She even tried to sound "black".
Status:
"Moldy Tater Gangrene, even before Moscow Marge."
(set 4 days ago)
Location: Dallas, TX
5,790 posts, read 3,601,582 times
Reputation: 5697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake
Truth hurts doesn't it? Drunk Nancy should have been enrolled in an assisted living home years ago.
Imagine that. A Trump true believer commits slander and ageism in a single sentence. Maybe not the technical definition of slander (drunkneness) but it's certainly slander in an ethical sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny
Do we need to REVISIT all the things Trump has SAID?
Can YOU handle the truth?
At best, the poster you quoted (Quick Enough) can handle selected truths. The full truth and nothing but the truth. Nope. Whether it makes sense to attach stigma to truths unpleasant to him and "team red" - even less. I mean, some of them still attach stigma to social practices and lifestyle choices strongly stigmatized in the past, yet no longer stigmatized today.
Actually, the opposite is true. Pelosi doesn't drink (not even coffee) and she isn't the unhinged one. Your boy in the White House is, despite being a teetotaler.
Pelosi spends over $100K/year in booze on her private plan from San Francisco to DC.
At best, the poster you quoted (Quick Enough) can handle selected truths. The full truth and nothing but the truth. Nope. Whether it makes sense to attach stigma to truths unpleasant to him and "team red" - even less. I mean, some of them still attach stigma to social practices and lifestyle choices strongly stigmatized in the past, yet no longer stigmatized today.
Who exactly is us? And sorry, Trump is not God. Our country isn't run by dictators or their cult. We have 3 branches of government
See post # 63. Re-read it again if necessary.
We didn't declare war. We took out one of the world's top terrorists. Getting Congress involved would mean that the terrorist would still be running around today.
Last edited by BeerGeek40; 01-12-2020 at 05:16 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
