Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How is this a good thing? For the Republicans, it shows they're terrified of what would come out. If they weren't, they'd allow them. It'd only help Trump if witnesses were called and he was exonerated. But because they know that won't happen, they won't allow it. He and his party know the extent of his corruption, and that's why they went with this absolutely ridiculous system where witnesses for a trial have to be voted on. Imagine if you murdered someone and your friends could vote against witnesses. Why would they do that, and why would you want them to unless theres doubt to your innocence?
You believe everything you are fed and have the audacity to call out us as defending corruption? You voted for HRC who is the most corrupt candidate ever put forth. Your VP of 8 years was a corrupt shill and a pay for play con artist.
The left praise that guilty until proven innocent sham fest in the house with all hand picked witnesses (who were not witnesses save one) by only the Dem's, not allowing the WH to have a single attorney? THAT was a travesty.
This is going to be so sad to see people screaming at the skies, rioting in the streets burning other people's stuff, and winding up for another 4 years of the same anti-American BS!
You believe everything you are fed and have the audacity to call out us as defending corruption? You voted for HRC who is the most corrupt candidate ever put forth. Your VP of 8 years was a corrupt shill and a pay for play con artist.
The left praise that guilty until proven innocent sham fest in the house with all hand picked witnesses (who were not witnesses save one) by only the Dem's, not allowing the WH to have a single attorney? THAT was a travesty.
This is going to be so sad to see people screaming at the skies, rioting in the streets burning other people's stuff, and winding up for another 4 years of the same anti-American BS!
You didn’t listen to what Murkowski said this evening...
How is this a good thing? For the Republicans, it shows they're terrified of what would come out. If they weren't, they'd allow them. It'd only help Trump if witnesses were called and he was exonerated. But because they know that won't happen, they won't allow it. He and his party know the extent of his corruption, and that's why they went with this absolutely ridiculous system where witnesses for a trial have to be voted on. Imagine if you murdered someone and your friends could vote against witnesses. Why would they do that, and why would you want them to unless theres doubt to your innocence?
For 3 1/2 years Trump and everyone and anything related have been investigated more that any other president or political figure in history. Raided lawyers office, Mueller investigation, Kavanaugh, SDNY, and now this phone call. I don't blame him for making it hard on them.
Terrified of what, that he asked that an investigation be done on something that every MSM and political figure for the last 10 years has deemed suspicious? Would it have been better if he had "purchased" the information, or maybe wiretapped the Bidens?
For 3 1/2 years Trump and everyone and anything related have been investigated more that any other president or political figure in history. Raided lawyers office, Mueller investigation, Kavanaugh, SDNY, and now this phone call. I don't blame him for making it hard on them.
What do you mean you don't blame him for making it hard for them? Why make it hard for a process to take place that ultimately would exonerate you if you're truly innocent?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist
You believe everything you are fed and have the audacity to call out us as defending corruption? You voted for HRC who is the most corrupt candidate ever put forth. Your VP of 8 years was a corrupt shill and a pay for play con artist.
The left praise that guilty until proven innocent sham fest in the house with all hand picked witnesses (who were not witnesses save one) by only the Dem's, not allowing the WH to have a single attorney? THAT was a travesty.
This is going to be so sad to see people screaming at the skies, rioting in the streets burning other people's stuff, and winding up for another 4 years of the same anti-American BS!
I get your overall generalization of me as a liberal, but I just have to say that technically I didn't vote for Hilary. I didn't vote at all. Look at my post history here. It drops off in like 2013. I don't post anywhere else. I didn't voice support for her because I didn't like her. I thought she would probably win since I didn't see another EC ****ing over a candidate happening just 16 years after the coup of 2000 (and that Trump was a xenophobic lunatic). Also, as a Texan the EC makes my vote in a Presidential election useless anyway.
President Donald Trump may be exonerated from impeachment by The Senate but the people who installed him as President will rebel against him for denying truth to come out.
President Donald Trump may be exonerated from impeachment by The Senate but the people who installed him as President will rebel against him for denying truth to come out.
Oh yeah I remember that. That was when Trump was IMPEACHED. Go ahead and remind the voters about that.
Don't worry, we will, he should have a commercial showing the pens and then whats her face saying to "impeach the MF"...then behind that put the word SHAM....
How is this a good thing? For the Republicans, it shows they're terrified of what would come out. If they weren't, they'd allow them. It'd only help Trump if witnesses were called and he was exonerated. But because they know that won't happen, they won't allow it. He and his party know the extent of his corruption, and that's why they went with this absolutely ridiculous system where witnesses for a trial have to be voted on. Imagine if you murdered someone and your friends could vote against witnesses. Why would they do that, and why would you want them to unless theres doubt to your innocence?
There's no such thing as witnesses to prove Trump's innocence or 'exonerate' him. Ten witnesses, including Zelensky himself could testify there wasn't a quid pro quid and it wouldn't matter. You have him guilty based on what's already happened. If I'm wrong, tell me who could testify and be said that changes your mind.
I wonder where the "its not bad enough to remove" Republican crowd will stand now that Joe Manchin is calling for a censure of Trump on the Senate floor.
A censure could have been the way to go from the start. Now it looks like they just rammed through a process to take it to the most extreme measure (impeachment) rightly reserved for the most egregious of actual crimes, and, failing that, backpedal to a more palatable action. IOW, TOO LATE.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump exonerated
