Do you believe there be a fair senate impeachment trial? (Clinton, solution)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Midnight Mitch wants to have the trial first and then debate after whether or not there should be evidence and witnesses. Imagine a trial with no evidence or witnesses. Talk about bass ackwards. Plus he wants a resolution that he can dismiss the trial at any time. W T F? I hope that they deliberate soberly the evidence and talk to all relevant witnesses but I have almost no faith that Mitch will do that. He might get away with it but history will bear witness to this and not be kind to all that try and engage in a farce.
Yes, its the same process that president Clinton got for his impeachment trial.
You can be no more fair than to have the same process for both a democrat, and Republican president.
Yah but it’s not if there is no witnesses or evidence. That is not the same as the Clinton trial and not fair. That’s what I call a sham trial. Show me a fair trial that did not have witnesses or evidence submitted... you can’t.
Midnight Mitch wants to have the trial first and then debate after whether or not there should be evidence and witnesses. Imagine a trial with no evidence or witnesses. Talk about bass ackwards. Plus he wants a resolution that he can dismiss the trial at any time. W T F? I hope that they deliberate soberly the evidence and talk to all relevant witnesses but I have almost no faith that Mitch will do that. He might get away with it but history will bear witness to this and not be kind to all that try and engage in a farce.
The farce is on the Left. Lying Schiff running his yap is guaranteeing the President's resounding reelection.
Yah but it’s not if there is no witnesses or evidence. That is not the same as the Clinton trial and not fair. That’s what I call a sham trial.
There will be evidence presented by both sides.
We don't know yet if there will be witnesses, or not.
If the dems want witnesses that have privileged information, and other potential witnesses have already publicly stated that they will refuse to testify (Schiff, Biden) then I don't see any reason to call witnesses.
If you think the American people will support dragging this out for six, or more months to go to the courts, you are mistaken.
This whole bogus impeachment process in the House and the Senate trial designed only to unseat a properly elected POTUS will be a giant stain on American History. Worse the slavery? No, but certainly more important than any other series of events in my lifetime.
Nasty Drunk Nancy wants to have the trial first and then debate after whether or not there should be evidence and witnesses. Imagine a trial with no evidence or witnesses from the other side. Talk about bass ackwards. Plus she wants to hold the Articles of Impeachment for a month.. W T F? I hope that they deliberate soberly the evidence and talk to all relevant witnesses but I have almost no faith that Nasty will do that. She might got away with it but history will bear witness to this and not be kind to all that try and engage in a farce.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
