There Is Bipartisan Agreement that President Trump is Guilty (legal, lawyers, Simpson)

[WaldoKitty]

Originally Posted by rjshae

For me the collective proceedings have served the purpose of demonstrating the true character of DJT. Nobody can vote in the 2020 election with blinders on, claiming ignorance of his character. There's no excuse for being duped this time. You know exactly what you're voting for.

Because you believe in the wisdom of Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, and Jerry Nader? hahahahahaha


People will indeed decide this in November. I'm looking forward to it.

[KayAnn246]

It's obvious that the fall in line GOP are guilty of the coverup.

https://twitter.com/QasimRashid/stat...68827049398272

[Elliott_CA]

Originally Posted by shiftymh

There is also bipartisan agreement that he is not guilty from the house vote, so this thread is pretty meaningless.

Not exactly true. The House vote is not a vote on guilt, only whether or not the case should be forwarded to the Senate.

[Bureaucat]

Originally Posted by Wintergirl80

That doesn't make sense to me. They know he was guilty, yet their going to acquit him anyway?

Can someone explain that?

Partisan loyalty

[DRob4JC]

Originally Posted by Wintergirl80

That doesn't make sense to me. They know he was guilty, yet their going to acquit him anyway?

Can someone explain that?

The case that the House made is not that big of a deal to warrant impeachment.

In other words, if the President broke the law and got a speeding ticket - would that warrant his impeachment? No.

We have spent enough time and effort on this and it's not a big deal.

[bobbythegreat]

Originally Posted by Wintergirl80

That doesn't make sense to me. They know he was guilty, yet their going to acquit him anyway?

Can someone explain that?

Easy, being "guilty" of treason against the DNC isn't an actual crime, thus you acquit

[notnamed]

Originally Posted by BruSan

REAL AMERICA understands the difference between activities by a President rising to the level of being designated impeachable offences versus criminal offences.

I guess you're not a member of the club after all.

And Real America recognizes that the president saying that he is offering our military as a mercenary force to Saudi Arabia is something that deserves removal...right?

[Leona Valley]

Originally Posted by DannyHobkins

Anyone who has read the transcript knows there is nothing there. Now if you fabricate lies and go on what a person, heard from a person, from another person what Pencil Neck did yes there was something there.

This. Why do you need a witness and their “recollection” of what was said when you have a transcript? You don’t. It’s how you interpret the transcript. No witnesses needed. The transcript is the ultimate witness.

[Toyman at Jewel Lake]

Originally Posted by Slave2thesystem

Here is where most people have a problem with. How come he didn’t ask his own DOJ?

Perhaps because the corruption, and evidence, are in Ukraine. Now-I do agree with you; once this impeachment circus is done, Trump SHOULD have the DOJ start an investigation. Complete with wiretaps. Unlimited subpoenas. Oh, he should make sure that Nunes names the persons to lead the charge for the CIA, NSA and FBI. Do EXACTLY as Obama did. Oh wait-we don't need to pay someone to cook up a fictional "dossier" on Biden-we can just use his own words.

[BigCityDreamer]

Trump is not guilty of anything. He exposed the corruption of the Bidens, and that is a good thing. This “impeachment” is history.

Time to move on to the next thing, people.