Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2020, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,142 posts, read 10,714,981 times
Reputation: 9799

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
This is a good thing to remember because often we only think of the present, but not the precedent.

Unfortunately, I fear we're already headed toward this when so many people these days don't trust the traditional news sources.



It’s the Constitution, Stupid
To forgo impeachment would be tantamount to saying that our president is now a king

By Thomas Friedman

If we say, as Republicans do, that what Trump did is not an impeachable offense, we are telling ourselves and every future president — in direct contradiction of what the founders wrote in the Constitution — that it is OK to enlist a foreign power to tilt the election your way. Can you imagine how much money candidates could raise from Saudi Arabia or China to tilt a future election their way, or how many cyberwarriors they could enlist from Russia or Iran to create fake news, suppress voting or spur outrage?

The integrity of our elections would be shattered, and we would never again have a legitimate president — a president, who, whether or not you liked him or her, was at least seen as legitimately elected. That would be a prescription for permanent political chaos, as no future presidents’ authority would be respected if they were elected on the basis of foreign interference.

https://www.registerguard.com/opinio...itution-stupid

https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/t...rica-1.4113326
Heard the same argument over the Clinton impeachment. It wasn't true then and it isn't true now. Unless the Dems have a statement from Trump saying that he not only blackmailed Ukraine but that he did it for the reason the Democrats are claiming, there isn't enough evidence to convict him. A conviction based on the evidence provided would set a horrendous precedent, far worse than what you claim above. We would see every president being impeached simply because the other party doesn't like them, no matter how many attempts it took to get that impeachment started.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2020, 05:38 PM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,144,620 times
Reputation: 8224
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat View Post
This is incredibly stupid.

The same people who opposed impeachment and removal of a president guilty of multiple felonies are now claiming that if the president is not removed despite committing no crime, it means he's a king. Never go full partisan hack.
Sorry - are you referring to Friedman? I don't know his past opinions, but it's possible that even people who didn't advocate impeachment/conviction a month or two ago might have changed their minds, given the continuing revelations of Trump misconduct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 05:43 PM
 
8,957 posts, read 2,560,296 times
Reputation: 4725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Sorry - are you referring to Friedman? I don't know his past opinions, but it's possible that even people who didn't advocate impeachment/conviction a month or two ago might have changed their minds, given the continuing revelations of Trump misconduct.
I'm not necessarily talking about any specific person, just the idea that refusal to remove a president who broke no laws all of a sudden means the US has a king is beyond stupid. It would be hard for me to believe that a rational and thinking human with a fully functional brain would come up with that.

I could see it if someone was just producing political propaganda aimed at low information groups of partisans, but not a legitimate position someone would honestly take.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 05:48 PM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,884,675 times
Reputation: 9117
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Why should the Democrats work with tRump when they don't agree with his legislative directive and neither do their voters?
It's called work to find compromise so that they can achieve consensus. The my way or the highway approach is why we are 22 trillion in debt, fighting wars in 5 countries, have 13 million illegals, lousy health care, and public education getting worse not better.

News flash. Party doesn't equal country and they are supposed to represent everyone, not just 50% of the population.

Hardliners are the real poison in the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Southern Nevada
6,751 posts, read 3,371,581 times
Reputation: 10375
No matter what they're told, or what the evidence points to, the left has their minds made up and will continue with their delusions, their lies, and their false narratives until the cows come home.

They should all get on the non-binary unicorns and fly off to Camp Pocahontas where they can all stay in their safe spaces and commiserate with each other on how bad they've been mistreated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 06:00 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
So now the collusion delusion and the Ukraine brain sprain lines have now been blurred?

First there was collusion. Which was found wanting.

Then the Ukraine brain sprain. Which apparently didn’t happen.

So which of the two was the impeachment about?

According to this opinion piece, it was multiple choice.
It was about orange man bad and shouldn't be there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,615,202 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
It's called work to find compromise so that they can achieve consensus. The my way or the highway approach is why we are 22 trillion in debt, fighting wars in 5 countries, have 13 million illegals, lousy health care, and public education getting worse not better.

News flash. Party doesn't equal country and they are supposed to represent everyone, not just 50% of the population.

Hardliners are the real poison in the system.
Except to tRump and Repubs, working together means the Democrats rolling over and rubber stamping their (Republicans) agenda. They've made it clear they don't want to compromise with Democrats at all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 07:21 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,399,266 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
Except to tRump and Repubs, working together means the Democrats rolling over and rubber stamping their (Republicans) agenda. They've made it clear they don't want to compromise with Democrats at all

With what the democrats have pulled in the last three years, you think that signals the will to "work together", "compromise", or anything short of a national cold war?

You are absolutely out of your mind.

You can't try to remove the President via extra democratic means, twice, and then complain about the other side not "compromising".

All you can do is pray to your rainbow colored god every night that the Republicans never gain the ability to deliver the political payback that the democrat machine so richly deserves.

At this point, Trump's base would agree to anything just to slightly annoy the progressive traitors in this nation. You are fifty light-years away from compromise. Its not even an option in this universe, as far as you are concerned going forward. There is a price for every action, and now your party will politically pay it by one means or another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 07:23 PM
 
4,021 posts, read 1,800,444 times
Reputation: 4862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Before you start imagining a landslide, keep in mind that Hillary had 2% MORE of the vote.
Earth to Clara - He's talking an electoral landslide, just like in 2016. Although this time it will be both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2020, 07:36 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,034 posts, read 9,512,383 times
Reputation: 10455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
Before you start imagining a landslide, keep in mind that Hillary had 2% MORE of the vote.
Well don’t care if it’s a landslide or not. That 2% is meaningless, she still loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top