Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't even see why this would be controversial. Why should federal funds go to cities that protect criminal aliens? That would be, in effect, asking American taxpayers (like me) to protect those who not only break into our country illegally, but go on to commit crimes against honest and law-abiding Americans.
For the love of god cut off funding to these clowns in Seattle who support this sanctuary BS! Governor Jay Inslee is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo horrible.
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him? The guy was already impeached for abuse of power.
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him?
Wrong! We have cities selectively deciding to make up their own immigration law, obstruct the feds, and force taxpayers to support illegals (one example is city-funded pro bono lawyers to defend them against deportation). City officials swore an oath to citizens not illegals, yet they still want federal money. Can’t have it both ways.
So now we have a SCOTUS-approved policy that allows the US President to selectively target and financially damage cities he does not like. This is no longer functioning at the federal level; it's down to specific cities. He can pick and choose which city he attacks. What is to stop him from applying this for leverage on other policies? Or just targeting cities that didn't vote for him? The guy was already impeached for abuse of power.
Meh... It's the law. SCOTUS says so. We Republicans love this Rule of Law stuff.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
