Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2020, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,566 posts, read 10,989,435 times
Reputation: 10816

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishvanguard View Post
“Militias” include bands of citizens who have inherent individual rights to own guns (including automatic weapons) in order to use in lawful ways and in order to throw off any unlawful, tyrannical infringements of their rights.

So, you see, the 2nd Amendment framework sets this right into place above further governmental edict. Like it or not.
That is just your interpretation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2020, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,566 posts, read 10,989,435 times
Reputation: 10816
Quote:
Originally Posted by NVplumber View Post
Sheesh. I just can't fathom how something so simple just cant seem to sink in. "Well regulated" does NOT mean overseen by the government. It means properly armed, equipped and ready.

Thus the individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed so the people can properly be equipped to defend themselves and their families, their communities. And if needs be the nation itself.

Thus also the phrase in the preamble "provide for the common defense." What is so tough to understand here? Or is it just willful density?
I think you are a bit confused in the words,"common defense".
Common defense means defense of the nation, not personal defense.
You , and many others need to remember the constitution was written soon after a war we had fought for Independence from a country hell bent on keeping this country enslaved by British dominance.
The founding fathers wanted to make sure a "well regulated militia" stood ready to once again,defend the nation.
Nothing about personal defense as some have stated , quite wrongly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,566 posts, read 10,989,435 times
Reputation: 10816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Where do you get this crap?
Any one with half a brain knows that government rules all of us.
If you don't think so, take a look at laws, just in what ever state you live in, let alone the federal government.
I will give you just a few examples.
Marijuana use is illegal, federally

In California, plastic straws are illegal, as is smoking in many places in the state.
The use of plastic bags for grocery stores is also illegal.
These are trivial items, but I know there are more serious limits on citizen freedoms, dictated by the government, so it isn't "crap".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 06:39 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,566 posts, read 10,989,435 times
Reputation: 10816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
(patiently)

An armed and capable populace is, exactly, a militia.
A militia is a select group of people gathered to protect the country, not the entire population being the militia, and the "well regulated militia" mentioned in teh 2nd is what the founders were talking about when the wrote the 2nd.
How in the hell could the entire population be a militia?
How, and who would make the entire population a "well regulated militia"?
How would they become regulated?
Do you know what a "well regulated militia" is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 07:06 PM
 
Location: VA, IL, FL, SD, TN, NC, SC
1,417 posts, read 735,601 times
Reputation: 3439
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
A militia is a select group of people gathered to protect the country, not the entire population being the militia, and the "well regulated militia" mentioned in teh 2nd is what the founders were talking about when the wrote the 2nd.
How in the hell could the entire population be a militia?
How, and who would make the entire population a "well regulated militia"?
How would they become regulated?
Do you know what a "well regulated militia" is?
“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, at the Virginia Ratifying Convention June 4, 1788

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Uh, that would be: game, set, and match.

In the end it comes down to this, when you are at the gym and an illegal alien breaks into your home and announces his intention to rape your wife and sodomize your six year old daughter do you want your wife to be able to refute his assertion?

As they say, God did not create all men equal, but Smith and Wesson made them that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 07:41 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,322 posts, read 26,245,816 times
Reputation: 15659
Quote:
Originally Posted by GhostOfAndrewJackson View Post
“I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.” – George Mason, at the Virginia Ratifying Convention June 4, 1788

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Uh, that would be: game, set, and match.

In the end it comes down to this, when you are at the gym and an illegal alien breaks into your home and announces his intention to rape your wife and sodomize your six year old daughter do you want your wife to be able to refute his assertion?

As they say, God did not create all men equal, but Smith and Wesson made them that way.
I haven’t heard a good definition of militia since the 1790’s. So today the militia takes the place of standing army of a few million. So are the Bundy’s and the other right wing right supremacist groups part of the new militia, who exactly leads them, who decides to attack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 10:36 PM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,616,966 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by CALGUY View Post
I have to disagree with your interpretation.
The amendment states the word "militia",not a"capable populace".

The founding fathers were only concerned with a well regulated militia being armed, not the populace.
I cannot remember the year, (Im sure another poster on here knows), it was declared that every adult person from the age of 18-45 was actually the nations 'militia'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 10:41 PM
 
28,122 posts, read 12,616,966 times
Reputation: 15341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I haven’t heard a good definition of militia since the 1790’s. So today the militia takes the place of standing army of a few million. So are the Bundy’s and the other right wing right supremacist groups part of the new militia, who exactly leads them, who decides to attack.
Well, if they were fighting tyranny...than yes, they would be patriots by definition!


Ive mentioned this a few times in the past and its relevant here...Real 'Patriotism' in the US today would look a lot like 'domestic terrorism' on the surface.


This is precisely how our tyrannical govt dupes people into taking their side...they make the patriots out to be terrorists and criminals, its clever and effective! If England had done this in response to the American Revolution...We would probably have a king today and be speaking the Queens english. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 11:16 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Where do you get this crap?
People have Rights. Citizens obtain privilege from those they consent to be governed by. The only constitutional mention for a Citizen, is voting and holding office. and neither of those are a right.


"CITIZEN - ... Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associative capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of government for the promotion of the general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights. "
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed. p.244

"... the term 'citizen,' in the United States, is analogous to the term "subject" in the common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government. ... he who before was a "subject of the King" is now a citizen of the State."
- - - State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144 (1838)

SUBJECT - One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws.
...Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. The term is little used, in this sense, in countries enjoying a republican form of government.
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 1425
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2020, 11:20 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlongTheI-5 View Post
If not well regulated, the criminals have the right to bear arms.
Criminals are hung by the neck.
Well, at least they use to be.
Then how would George Washington & Paul Revere get their weapons? they were certainly criminals to the King(our government at the time) So, yes. Criminal also have every right to have arms.
The only way you can limit anyone's RIGHTS is to kill them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top