Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2020, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,223,112 times
Reputation: 14408

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsrightfam View Post
But I am sure of this. Socialism for the rich like we had in 2008 bailout and now in 2020 is not the way forward, not ethically, not practically because it's causing extreme resentment of "eat the rich" type which is not sustainable.
I don't think you understand what did happen then and what is happening now.

While I personally believe the banks should have been allowed to fail - which would have harmed shareholders who tacitly invested in and approved of the activities, and depositors holding > 100K - the "bailout" was paid back. It was a package of loans, loans that were explicitly repaid. Now, there's a bailout factor for GM, since we haven't really recouped 100% there. From Propublica https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/

Quote:
Altogether, accounting for both the TARP and the Fannie and Freddie bailout, $634B has gone out the door.

Money has been coming back in two ways: $390B of principal has been repaid, and the Treasury has collected revenue from its investments of $364B.

In total, the government has realized a $121B profit as of March 19, 2020.
Now, here's our 2020 project (does not yet include the latest bill to expand SBA "loans" and aid to hospitals)

What's in the $2 Trillion Coronavirus Relief Package? | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Please tell us what items in the 2.3T are bailing out the rich, and then what % of the total is bailing out the rich
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2020, 10:13 AM
 
245 posts, read 169,178 times
Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Like it or hate it,the following is only my opinion:


You hit the nail on the head.
I find it a disgrace watching folks on television telling reporters as they wait in line for free food
that they can not meet next months rent while driving a Lexus RX350 worth around $40,000 dollars.
Reminds me of the 70's where riots in New York went global and all the Russians could see were minorities
smashing store windows,stealing t.v. sets while wearing expensive clothes and $100 dollar sneakers.


Keeping things in Priority is the responsibility of the individual not the government.
If half the country can't make it to next month because of lack of savings it is time
to learn what the other half has done , as is doing ..... to get by without great worry.

OK, but could the first half save even if they were "prudent"? Do they get enough income to even be able to save? I don't have the numbers but my impression is - no. They get paid just enough to get them to the next month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 10:19 AM
 
245 posts, read 169,178 times
Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
I don't think you understand what did happen then and what is happening now.

While I personally believe the banks should have been allowed to fail - which would have harmed shareholders who tacitly invested in and approved of the activities, and depositors holding > 100K - the "bailout" was paid back. It was a package of loans, loans that were explicitly repaid. Now, there's a bailout factor for GM, since we haven't really recouped 100% there. From Propublica https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/



Now, here's our 2020 project (does not yet include the latest bill to expand SBA "loans" and aid to hospitals)

What's in the $2 Trillion Coronavirus Relief Package? | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Please tell us what items in the 2.3T are bailing out the rich, and then what % of the total is bailing out the rich

Even if 08 bailout was net profitable it's distorted natural mechanisms of the economy and the market. More specifically, risk taking, leverage, debt, etc. It encouraged both big corps and investors to continue taking risks they would not have otherwise, knowing they will be bailed out. Setting up another cycle of obscene overleveraging, stock buybacks and all that good stuff.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard


I might be just a little more informed than you initially thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 10:32 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,508,176 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Like it or hate it,the following is only my opinion:


You hit the nail on the head.
I find it a disgrace watching folks on television telling reporters as they wait in line for free food
that they can not meet next months rent while driving a Lexus RX350 worth around $40,000 dollars.
Reminds me of the 70's where riots in New York went global and all the Russians could see were minorities
smashing store windows,stealing t.v. sets while wearing expensive clothes and $100 dollar sneakers.


Keeping things in Priority is the responsibility of the individual not the government.
If half the country can't make it to next month because of lack of savings it is time
to learn what the other half has done , as is doing ..... to get by without great worry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsrightfam View Post
OK, but could the first half save even if they were "prudent"? Do they get enough income to even be able to save? I don't have the numbers but my impression is - no. They get paid just enough to get them to the next month.
The first poster’s point is that people were in line for free food and saying they can’t meet next month’s rent - but were driving $40,000 Lexus vehicles. (I believe Lexus would be more than that, actually.). A prudent person does not spend $40,000 on a car if he doesn’t even have enough savings to cover a month of food and rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 10:39 AM
 
2,448 posts, read 894,579 times
Reputation: 2421
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
We own nothing. The State owns all of us.
The nonagression principle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 11:20 AM
 
245 posts, read 169,178 times
Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
I don't think you understand what did happen then and what is happening now.

While I personally believe the banks should have been allowed to fail - which would have harmed shareholders who tacitly invested in and approved of the activities, and depositors holding > 100K - the "bailout" was paid back. It was a package of loans, loans that were explicitly repaid. Now, there's a bailout factor for GM, since we haven't really recouped 100% there. From Propublica https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/



Now, here's our 2020 project (does not yet include the latest bill to expand SBA "loans" and aid to hospitals)

What's in the $2 Trillion Coronavirus Relief Package? | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Please tell us what items in the 2.3T are bailing out the rich, and then what % of the total is bailing out the rich

I'd say this dude knows more about business and finance than you, no? I just happen to agree with him.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9g0TpzE3DE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 11:21 AM
 
7,520 posts, read 2,811,117 times
Reputation: 3941
Stop worshipping government and thinking they are the answer to all your woes. Both parties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,223,112 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsrightfam View Post
Even if 08 bailout was net profitable it's distorted natural mechanisms of the economy and the market. More specifically, risk taking, leverage, debt, etc. It encouraged both big corps and investors to continue taking risks they would not have otherwise, knowing they will be bailed out. Setting up another cycle of obscene overleveraging, stock buybacks and all that good stuff.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard


I might be just a little more informed than you initially thought.
well sure, if you had included this in your other post. It's pretty much exactly what I said

What about the terms of THIS bailout?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,223,112 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsrightfam View Post
I'd say this dude knows more about business and finance than you, no? I just happen to agree with him.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9g0TpzE3DE
another good find, and one I've already seen and based my opinion and comment on.

I've got an econ, a bus mgt, was a commercial banker for a decade, and having been a Realtor for > 20 years, hav wide first-hand experience with 2008.

And your resume/curriculum vitae is...? You might easily be more knowledgable than me too, but just hesitant to have shared earlier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2020, 11:55 AM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,928,456 times
Reputation: 7553
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
As has been the case since the stone age.

Yes, when the biggest hairiest bad-azz guy with the largest stone ax in the clan laid down the law and the rest of the clan followed it, by golly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top