Malicious Prosecution, Kenosha DA, Kyle American Hero (solution, politician, kids)

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by bohemka

Same exact story we've seen many times and will see again. Gun-toting wannabe mall cop Karen inserts himself in a situation he can't get out of, so he shoots people.

And it's self defense, of course, because he's absolved of every single thought and action he put into entering that encounter, while the people he kills have their arrest records paraded out and are judged on everything they've ever done So this idiot is a "hero" because he went random vigilante executioner as if the PD and courts failed by not previously sentencing these people to death.

The way you people spin these events is sick and twisted. This is some third-world mentality BS.

what encounter?


all I see is Kyle running & retreating from the attackers until they caught up with him and that's when he shot them.


Is it normal for "victims" to chase after their "attackers"?

[r small]

Originally Posted by berdee

It was not his job to apprehend anyone. Call 911 and report it yes, apprehend no. He should have called 911 and had the police stop Kyle.

Let the police handle the situation? Isn't that what Rittenhouse should have done rather than running around in the middle of a riot with an AR-15 trying to be a vigilante? Idiot kid should have stayed home and played video games.

[bobbythegreat]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

Or he could just have stayed home and no one would have been killed.

Just an idea. He accomplished absolutely nothing by his actions.

Had he stayed home your terrorist comrades would have just attacked someone else potentially killing them or being killed by them.

It worked out for the best that he showed up and put down 2 terrorists before they could hurt anyone

[mkpunk]

Originally Posted by bohemka

Same exact story we've seen many times and will see again. Gun-toting wannabe mall cop Karen inserts himself in a situation he can't get out of, so he shoots people.

And it's self defense, of course, because he's absolved of every single thought and action he put into entering that encounter, while the people he kills have their arrest records paraded out and are judged on everything they've ever done So this idiot is a "hero" because he went random vigilante executioner as if the PD and courts failed by not previously sentencing these people to death.

The way you people spin these events is sick and twisted. This is some third-world mentality BS.

Amen. That said i wouldn't say it is third world just a "Just World Falacy." Basically Blake deserved it due to his actions as did the people shot by this political agitator.

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

Or he could just have stayed home and no one would have been killed.

Just an idea, since he accomplished absolutely nothing by his actions.

or maybe the dead and wounded guys could have stay home before 8pm curfew. better yet, do not attack someone armed with an AR.




and yes, Kyle saved his own life. I would say that is a very big accomplishment.

[southking500]

Originally Posted by bohemka

Same exact story we've seen many times and will see again. Gun-toting wannabe mall cop Karen inserts himself in a situation he can't get out of, so he shoots people.

And it's self defense, of course, because he's absolved of every single thought and action he put into entering that encounter, while the people he kills have their arrest records paraded out and are judged on everything they've ever done So this idiot is a "hero" because he went random vigilante executioner as if the PD and courts failed by not previously sentencing these people to death.

The way you people spin these events is sick and twisted. This is some third-world mentality BS.

So in your opinion Rittenhouse should have allowed the violent mob members kill him as they clearly intended to do? Death penalty for being a "Karen"?

[mkpunk]

Originally Posted by Du Ma

what encounter?


all I see is Kyle running & retreating from the attackers until they caught up with him and that's when he shot them.


Is it normal for "victims" to chase after their "attackers"?

It does if the "attackers" think the "victim" was an attacker. Look at a number of mass shootings where people did fight back fir reference.

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by r small

Let the police handle the situation? Isn't that what Rittenhouse should have done rather than running around in the middle of a riot with an AR-15 trying to be a vigilante? Idiot kid should have stayed home and played video games.

riot and loot 3 days straight in Kenosha. Yeah, i'm sure police got a good handle on it, right?


if they really did their job, they would have go out and arrest people for violating 8pm curfew.




can't even fault the police because they have their hands tied by the local progressive politicians.

[bobbythegreat]

Originally Posted by mkpunk

It does if the "attackers" think the "victim" was an attacker. Look at a number of mass shootings where people did fight back fir reference.

No.... that's actually illegal under Wisconsin law.

[Du Ma]

Originally Posted by mkpunk

It does if the "attackers" think the "victim" was an attacker. Look at a number of mass shootings where people did fight back fir reference.

so you are saying in an active shooter/mass shooter scenario, I should go after the shooter even though i'm not cornered or trapped? I should go CHASE after the active shooter with my skateboard on the street?