Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2020, 05:47 PM
 
8,725 posts, read 7,431,898 times
Reputation: 12614

Advertisements

You can sit on a sofa 24/7 and still not be fat.

It is over eating, plain and simple.

 
Old 09-19-2020, 05:53 PM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,895 posts, read 6,599,034 times
Reputation: 13389
Why is it cheaper to buy a bag of sugary candy or salted potato chips than a healthy salad? Too much hyperprocessed food is available for cheap. Rather than wasting billions of dollars to subsidize grains, dairy, and cattle, what we should be doing is subsidizing healthy fruit and vegetables. An entire junk food industry has grown fat on the government's subsidy.
 
Old 09-19-2020, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,857 posts, read 24,982,405 times
Reputation: 28579
Quote:
Originally Posted by k350 View Post
You can sit on a sofa 24/7 and still not be fat.

It is over eating, plain and simple.

"Over eating" is a vague term that says nothing about how much someone is consuming, or what their lifestyle entails. If someone sitting on the couch all day eats the typical diet of a body builder, the person on the couch will get fat. Same caloric consumption, different results.


The lifestyle of the average American today is nothing like it was 100 years ago, when people were leaner. The biggest difference is the type of work people were doing then vs now. Most people are getting jobs today where they sit in a chair for the majority of the day, in front of a computer, etc. And when they come home, they are pecking away and their cell phone or computer, or watching TV.
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:02 PM
 
8,725 posts, read 7,431,898 times
Reputation: 12614
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjshae View Post
Why is it cheaper to buy a bag of sugary candy or salted potato chips than a healthy salad? Too much hyperprocessed food is available for cheap. Rather than wasting billions of dollars to subsidize grains, dairy, and cattle, what we should be doing is subsidizing healthy fruit and vegetables. An entire junk food industry has grown fat on the government's subsidy.
Same food and pricing is available in many countries and even here in the US, yet the obesity disparities still exist even though access to food is the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
"Over eating" is a vague term that says nothing about how much someone is consuming, or what their lifestyle entails. If someone sitting on the couch all day eats the typical diet of a body builder, the person on the couch will get fat. Same caloric consumption, different results.


The lifestyle of the average American today is nothing like it was 100 years ago, when people were leaner. The biggest difference is the type of work people were doing then vs now. Most people are getting jobs today where they sit in a chair for the majority of the day, in front of a computer, etc. And when they come home, they are pecking away and their cell phone or computer, or watching TV.
Over eating is not a vague term at all, it means you eating too damn much, plain and simple. Quit eating so much.

It is not even 100 years, the obesity shift is only one generation, starting in the 80's, but accelerating in the 90's.
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Flyover part of Virginia
4,252 posts, read 2,477,240 times
Reputation: 5088
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
"Over eating" is a vague term that says nothing about how much someone is consuming, or what their lifestyle entails. If someone sitting on the couch all day eats the typical diet of a body builder, the person on the couch will get fat. Same caloric consumption, different results.


The lifestyle of the average American today is nothing like it was 100 years ago, when people were leaner. The biggest difference is the type of work people were doing then vs now. Most people are getting jobs today where they sit in a chair for the majority of the day, in front of a computer, etc. And when they come home, they are pecking away and their cell phone or computer, or watching TV.
100 years ago, almost no one "went to the gym" except for boxers, now there's a gym on practically every corner and we still have this obesity epidemic.
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:18 PM
 
7,977 posts, read 5,002,395 times
Reputation: 15967
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
I doubt that's what's doing it. Most people have enough sense not to eat that stuff every day. Eating that once a week or so isn't going to make people fat.

Sedentary lifestyle is what's doing it. Too much sitting on the couch, playing with the cell phone, time spent burning off very few calories. I eat a garbage diet, a fair amount of fast food... But I have a physically demanding job, and I work 70 hours a week. Maybe not the healthiest lifestyle, but I'm burning lots of calories, and am near underweight for my height, and always have been.

Try getting Americans off the couch, and watch the lard melt. And bring back some of those physically demanding jobs from China that democrats look down upon. China is making America fat and lazy, and democrats couldn't be more happy about that.


Well maybe you just got lucky with genetics. Not everyone gets fat. Some are predisposed to being fat within the family history. Im naturally between cause I had a skinny father's side and a fat mother's side. But alot of people inherited the "fat gene" and these which republican business owners don't help matters being able to operate. They put addictive chemicals in their food too no different from a drug dealer selling addictive drugs. Point is, EVERYONE is to blame. Not just the citizens eating it.

Im tired of just seeing the commoners being blamed for every atrocity and not the rich
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:23 PM
 
7,977 posts, read 5,002,395 times
Reputation: 15967
Quote:
Originally Posted by k350 View Post
You can sit on a sofa 24/7 and still not be fat.

It is over eating, plain and simple.


. Its the crap being put in people's mouths by corporations. But god forbid we blame the businesses and the rich of anything.
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:24 PM
 
18,535 posts, read 8,356,068 times
Reputation: 13851
somehow I just knew this would be everyone else's fault.....
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:25 PM
 
7,977 posts, read 5,002,395 times
Reputation: 15967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
somehow I just knew this would be everyone else's fault.....
What do you expect from a society where no one in charge that actually has power takes responsibility for ANYTHING
 
Old 09-19-2020, 06:28 PM
 
8,060 posts, read 3,956,797 times
Reputation: 5356
Take any study that uses BMI to "measure" fat with a healthy dose of salt.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top