*****The Vice Presidential Debate 10/7/2020***** (Congress, Reagan, illegal, Pelosi)

[greywar]

Originally Posted by paracord

Yeah let's see...people in PA care about:

a. Fracking (their jobs, our energy independence)

or

b. the "Proud Boys" (a group barely anyone who doesn't tweet all day has ever even heard of).


Hmmmmmm.

Cool. Meanwhile we have a whole bunch of states.


And PA is probably happy Biden has no intent of stopping fracking.

[paracord]

Originally Posted by greywar

you're talking about when he said he would ban subsidies for it? Thats a different question. But you know that.

LOL. And Trump is telling violent groups to "stand by" while he refuses to say he will accept losing. Quite the contrast. Thanks for that.

Wouldn't "no new fracking" be a ban on fracking?

[paracord]

Originally Posted by greywar

you're talking about when he said he would ban subsidies for it? Thats a different question. But you know that.

LOL. And Trump is telling violent groups to "stand by" while he refuses to say he will accept losing. Quite the contrast. Thanks for that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4_2ynjacFI

[greywar]

Originally Posted by paracord

Wouldn't "no new fracking" be a ban on fracking?

Not really. There are a TON of Fracking licenses issued, far more then are used. I helped negotiate someone selling rights to their property in PA for fracking. And....its just sitting there. Thats unlikely to change much of anything.


But please tell me more about how "no more subsidies" leads you to "no fracking" some more. Also youtube gotcha videos where you cut the guy off and dont provide context arent honest arguments....but you know that...right?

[bu2]

Originally Posted by greywar

Not really. There are a TON of Fracking licenses issued, far more then are used. I helped negotiate someone selling rights to their property in PA for fracking. And....its just sitting there. Thats unlikely to change much of anything.


But please tell me more about how "no more subsidies" leads you to "no fracking" some more. Also youtube gotcha videos where you cut the guy off and dont provide context arent honest arguments....but you know that...right?

Y'all sound like Bill Clinton. It depends on the definition of "is."

Pretty pathetic and dismal coverage of Biden's lies.

[Stizzel]

Originally Posted by bu2

Because the Democrats always killed it.

How can the democrats kill something that doesn't exist

What are the details of Trump's healthcare plan. He has touted this so called plan but I have yet to see the details of this plan.

[Swingblade]

I thought it was very telling she did not want to answer the question I think a lot of people will take note of that. Could be smart move on her part by not letting the cat out of the bag. I expect the {D}s if they gain the Senate and POTUS will attempt to stack the court. What other move do they have to stop a conservative leaning court?

[ipaper]

Originally Posted by RowingFiend

Why do you care? You already voted against America and for Marxism.

Yes, as an American who served his country willingly, I voted for another American, Joe Biden.

[4dognight]

Originally Posted by Hopeful for Life

It’s hard to argue with facts.

Fact check.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxKfeZcJ7-w

[mike1003]

I rewatched the first half hour-40 minutes. The moderator needed a new timer. I timing it. Guess who’s getting, on average, one minute 40 seconds and two minutes 18 seconds



Hint: VP Pence got the shortened times


Also, Mod used a softer voice when trying to interrupt harris than she die with Pence