Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Another in favor of rolling over. King George would proud of you.
It's not rolling over, it's obeying the law. cooperate and make your life easier. When a cop stops you you say yes sir, no sir. If you are in the right and the cop is in the wrong, it will come out in court.
One woulds think that one who professes to Loveshiscountyr would understand. Some would prefer to be a jerk...
Yet so many on here think everyone and their mothers should have semi automatic assault rifles in case the GOVERNMENT tries to infringe on their god given rights.
Cops aren’t an occupying force in the USA. If you believe their violating your rights, I would say it’s your duty to resist. Unless we became China all of the sudden.
YOu resist a wrongly accusing cop in court, not in the street. In the street you will ALWAYS lose.
LOL, you just made me snarf coffee on my keyboard. Where did you hear that ridiculous tripe? Oh look - a unicorn just jumped over a rainbow right outside your window. Seriously, dude, get real. Your rights are precisely what the society you choose to live in give you.
No I am equating people who don't care about rights to King George.
quit making things up and try harder
Right to what now. Not be stopped by the cops for a traffic violation? The right to argue with officers obnoxiously, be combative, interfere with a stop.
Exactly what rights were the cops violating that we don't care about.
Depends on ones beliefs. Your creator or just because you were born. Natural birth rights
Those are 2 good ones.
Well thats nice and vague.
What rights are all of them.
What are natural born rights?
You realize you said we dont get rights from the constitution but the founding documents then said the constitution was a founding document.
He didn't stop them on suspicion - he said he stopped them for a rolling stop. Fine, then give them the ticket or warning and let them go. This b.s. that a rolling stop requires a passenger to hand over his ID is insane.
He didn't stop them on suspicion - he said he stopped them for a rolling stop. Fine, then give them the ticket or warning and let them go. This b.s. that a rolling stop requires a passenger to hand over his ID is insane.
No one said they were pulled over for suspicion. It was asked what probable cause and I stated they CAN state suspicion as probable cause. They dont have to discuss any probable cause.
We dont know they were not in the process of giving a warning or ticket to the driver when big mouth began being obnoxious and combative. They would most likely never have acknowledged him if he would have kept his mouth shut but we will never know as camera did not start rolling until the situation had escalated. As usual.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
