Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The election worker also mentioned that one of the rules said that she could not issue "absentee ballots" to anyone on the day of the election, but her supervisors told her do issue them anyway. They also told her to never invalidate any ballots for any reason.
Can you imagine this testimony being publicly presented in court? It would be devastating. Yet none of the MSM stations are showing it as-is. Is there any rational reason why this testimony won't be presented in court? Will it be televised?
The election worker is describing instance after instance where she was not allowed to do her work and follow the rules. She persisted, and finally her supervisor called her names (sound familiar?), took off her own (supervisor's) badge and threw it at her.
Can you imagine this testimony being publicly presented in court? It would be devastating. Yet none of the MSM stations are showing it as-is. Is there any rational reason why this testimony won't be presented in court? Will it be televised?
The one time Rudy was before a judge in PA he admitted that he was not presenting evidence of election fraud. He's not that bright, but at least he's smart enough not to lie to a judge.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 10 days ago)
35,636 posts, read 17,982,736 times
Reputation: 50678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer
The election worker also mentioned that one of the rules said that she could not issue "absentee ballots" to anyone on the day of the election, but her supervisors told her do issue them anyway. They also told her to never invalidate any ballots for any reason.
I could see that. A lowest tier poll worker shouldn't be invalidating ballots. There should be a stack of ballots that need review placed in a separate box, with a sticky note signed by the poll worker and a brief explanation of why the ballot was questionable. "Voted for both candidates", "unclear the preference", "ballot ripped in half" etc
You shouldn't have one person, sitting by themself, making decisions to invalidate a ballot.
Now a witness who says she's a worker for Dominion Voting Systems. Describing how she saw many workers running batches of ballots through the tabulating machines again and again without discarding them. She said she saw them running the same ballots through the machines, "time after time", "thousands of times", essentially counting the same ballots over and over.
Now a witness who says she's a worker for Dominion Voting Systems. Describing how she saw many workers running batches of ballots through the tabulating machines again and again without discarding them. She said she saw them running the same ballots through the machines, "time after time", "thousands of times", essentially counting the same ballots over and over.
Uh huh. Sure she did. And shes a dominion worker? Please. Now can we get her to do it under oath naming the people? Or will she suddenly not remember?
I could see that. A lowest tier poll worker shouldn't be invalidating ballots. There should be a stack of ballots that need review placed in a separate box, with a sticky note signed by the poll worker and a brief explanation of why the ballot was questionable. "Voted for both candidates", "unclear the preference", "ballot ripped in half" etc
That's exactly what she was doing, from her testimony. Are you even listening to the hearing?
Quote:
You shouldn't have one person, sitting by themself, making decisions to invalidate a ballot.
They didn't, according to her testimony.
Nice try.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
