ABC News: Over 100 fully vaccinated people contract COVID-19 in Washington state, officials say

[roodd279]

wow, Suzy, were you just called a paid micro-influnence?? HAHAHA.



A paid anarchist would do exactly what toodie is doing.


You have no clue as to possible harmful effects these vaccines may hold in the future on the populace.

What is the alternative? Wait an amount of time that comforts you before declaring it safe? How much time is that? Why do you get to decide and not, say, the CDC? What if they already decided on a time - and that time is past? You will simply say, Not long enough? So - how long is enough?

[roodd279]

sorry, I spelled influencer wrong, mainly while giggling but also because i really dislike that word. so does my spellchecker.

[suzy_q2010]

[quote=toodie;60832981]

Originally Posted by suzy_q2010

Your arguments and objections are noted.
They are nonsensical imo.

You have no clue as to possible harmful effects these vaccines may hold in the future on the populace.
No one does. At least not the takers.

A paid micro-influencer would do what you're doing on this board.

Good luck. Over and out.

There is no biological reason for the mRNA vaccines to have harmful effects on the magnitude of those of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The only payment I have ever received for posting here is the prize awarded some years ago by City Data.

The pharma shill gambit is a weak debate tactic, by the way, and a form of ad hominem attack.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the...-shill-gambit/

[suzy_q2010]

Originally Posted by roodd279

wow, Suzy, were you just called a paid micro-influnence?? HAHAHA.



A paid anarchist would do exactly what toodie is doing.


You have no clue as to possible harmful effects these vaccines may hold in the future on the populace.

What is the alternative? Wait an amount of time that comforts you before declaring it safe? How much time is that? Why do you get to decide and not, say, the CDC? What if they already decided on a time - and that time is past? You will simply say, Not long enough? So - how long is enough?

Yeah. No one who has accused me of that (and there have been many) has ever been able to tell me what drug company to contact to find out where my money is, though.

[No_Recess]

The vaccines aren’t 100% effective. Never claimed to be.

Maybe we should require posters to pass a basic math test before they post.

[lieqiang]

Originally Posted by roodd279

wow, Suzy, were you just called a paid micro-influnence?? HAHAHA.

Can you imagine? They planted SuzyQ back here in 2010, had her slowly accumulate 30k posts, and then right now when the pharmacy industry needs her most, the spring the sleeper cell!

Actually that doesn't make sense either, countries all over the world are desperately trying to buy as many covid vaccine doses as they can. What were they thinking hey man USA is already buying enough of our vaccines to do their population twice over but if we can leverage SuzyQ to convince those pesky doubters on the CityData forum our fortunes will really be looking bright with these vaccines.

Originally Posted by roodd279

What is the alternative? Wait an amount of time that comforts you before declaring it safe? How much time is that? Why do you get to decide and not, say, the CDC? What if they already decided on a time - and that time is past? You will simply say, Not long enough? So - how long is enough?

The "arbitrary time" argument has been thrown around a lot in here, and you nailed the exact flaw with it. What about all those hepatitis C drugs that started appearing in 2013-2014 what if they start doing something unexpected after a decade? What if HPV vaccines turn people into newts after 20 years?