Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2021, 06:20 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20884

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post
I am certain Biden's EOs on gun control will be vigorously challenged in court.
And vigorously ignored in the free states.

So who does Biden think will enforce his decrees?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2021, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,898 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Is the current gun safety training course you have to go through to get your concealed carry permit really so excessive?

I realize you may not need it, but I think the people of the state of Texas take some degree of comfort knowing that people carrying conceal weapons in accordance with the law are not completely unfamiliar with gun safety.

A concealed carry permit is not very difficult to get in the state of Texas. I like that we have this small amount of mandatory safety training for people carrying these weapons.
How about we implement a test for voting rights also, would that be ok? How about anyone wishing to speak freely on a forum or blog take a test first? How about mandatory background checks,fees and licensing for anyone in the media, would that be ok with you?
Why is it only the second amendment that faces these ridiculous test, fees, licence's?
Far, far more deaths are caused by rabble rousers throughout history, Hitler, Lenin, mao, etc. even before guns existed.
Just look at the radio broadcast during the Rawanda genocide, many historians link these broadcast to hundreds of thousands of murders.
The 1st amendment is far more dangerous than the second.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 06:49 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,558 posts, read 17,227,205 times
Reputation: 17599
Take comfort, the latest CO shooter will be assured of casting a vote in the next election. Bernie told us he would even support the boston bomber to cast a vote. It is Sanders and company now running the country using biden as a front man and harris as a screen saver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 06:54 AM
 
24,411 posts, read 23,065,142 times
Reputation: 15018
If Usurper Joe REALLY wanted to curb gun violence, he'd ban left wing DA's, Mayors and Governors and anyone who accepted money from George Soros to campaign.
The thing Joe, is this. You're a senile old dumbass and you've never made a sound decision in your life. On top of that , you're not even POTUS and everyone knows it. So kindly take your EO's and shove them up your ass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,632 posts, read 9,458,962 times
Reputation: 22975
The inner city gangs are trembling with fear over these new executive orders.

Joe just solved inner city mass shootings, something Obama couldn't do in 8 years.

All hail Messiah-Biden, all hail Joe Dementia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
6,993 posts, read 2,705,786 times
Reputation: 7169
Joe Blow praised the "Red Flag" law in Delaware that is named after his dead son Beau, but his crackhead son owns a gun even though he was dishonorably discharged from the military.

Joe Blow says that "Red Flag" laws will prevent people from using guns to commit suicide, but at the same time says women should have the right to murder their own children by aborting them calling it "choice". Isn't committing suicide a "choice"???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,111,507 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annandale_Man View Post
Joe Blow says that "Red Flag" laws will prevent people from using guns to commit suicide, but at the same time says women should have the right to murder their own children by aborting them calling it "choice".
It's also a little ironic that it tends to be progressives who support euthanasia/assisted suicide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 07:12 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,632 posts, read 9,458,962 times
Reputation: 22975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annandale_Man View Post
Joe Blow praised the "Red Flag" law in Delaware that is named after his dead son Beau, but his crackhead son owns a gun even though he was dishonorably discharged from the military.

Joe Blow says that "Red Flag" laws will prevent people from using guns to commit suicide, but at the same time says women should have the right to murder their own children by aborting them calling it "choice". Isn't committing suicide a "choice"???
Democrats also claim "my body my choice" but then say "get a vaccine or die."

It's the ultimate irony.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Arizona
7,511 posts, read 4,354,336 times
Reputation: 6164
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The founders were very smart when they came to the conclusion, only property owners could vote.
"The experiment in self governance will end, when the people realize they can vote themselves to liquidate the entire US Treasury and dissolve all sovereignty"

Quote:
People with skin in the game, getting told what to do by people that have no skin in the game under the threat of violence, is straight up coercion, bordering on extortion.


Quote:
The debate over gun control can be summed up thusly: Those of us who don't like guns in the hands of our non-costumed brethren, will vote to ensure men with guns, under the guise of the "law," will come and take the property that is rightfully yours, killing you should you resist our will sufficiently.

This is what we call "violence by-proxy" and makes the voter for violence no less culpable in the extortion and death that will ensue.

As Stefan Molyneux correctly observed; if a person claims they are non-violent and are for “gun control” they are not truly anti-gun nor are they non-violent people - because the reality is that guns and violence will be needed to disarm innocent law abiding people.

This is because those people who claim they are anti-gun and anti-violence, who claim to support “gun control,” will need the credible threat of police violence and the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns should they resist the attempt to further centralize their monopoly on violence.

So those who claim to be anti-gun and anti-violence are really very pro-gun and very pro-violence. They ultimately believe that only government officials (which are of course portrayed as reliable, honest, moral, and virtuous) should be allowed to have guns. This obviously flies in the face of reality as the 20th century has proven once and for all.

It’s important to note that those who advocate this type of centralized monopoly of violence do so as cowards, because it’s not their lives on the line, rather they advocate others using violence on their behalf in
order to force their misguided views on innocent people who wish to do nothing other than protect themselves and other innocents.

There is no such thing as "gun control," there is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political class and the forces they control which, as recent history has proven is a murderous nightmare for the peace loving, disenfranchised, and disarmed citizenry.--Ron Danielowski
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2021, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Arizona
7,511 posts, read 4,354,336 times
Reputation: 6164
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
This is a little confrontational, but it's absolutely correct. It *IS* time to pick a side. Either you support gun rights, or you don't. We need to break out of the clique mindset. It's fostered by the anti-gun people to divide us.

You don't have to agree that ARs are particularly useful, or that anyone needs a 30 round magazine, but those are small details in the overall scheme of things. Support gun rights, if you support gun rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top