Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2021, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Phila & NYC
4,783 posts, read 3,307,997 times
Reputation: 1953

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbsoluteVirtue View Post
Sick. These men are going to dominate women's sports. All I can do is watch and laugh.
Same old tired argument. In Collegiate sports trans females have been competing for 10 years now. The NCAA made claim in that 10 yr period there has been at least 50 trans females competing at any given time with a total over 200. Only 1 (half of 1 percent) was competitive enough to compete at the Div 1 level.
Why would the next 10 years be much different?

That is also the reason why the courts will strike down state bans that include Public Universities. There is conflicting data, and there is real life history. Real life events do not conform to the theory that trans females after transition have inherent advantages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2021, 05:33 PM
 
Location: California
37,155 posts, read 42,278,198 times
Reputation: 35041
Transwomen are not women and most biological women agree with this, even if they talk the talk to be polite. Women are so polite all the time the get steamrolled and victimized, this is a FACT. All the excuses in the world won't change biology and this issue should never have entered the public square, it's just that obvious to anyone with intelligence who doesn't play the "lets pretend" game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 05:39 PM
 
26,569 posts, read 15,136,083 times
Reputation: 14699
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post

Democrat insanity strikes again.
Many democrats deny the science that there are significant biological differences between men and women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,592 posts, read 18,208,471 times
Reputation: 15566
Biden and his goofball ideology strikes again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 05:53 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,067,920 times
Reputation: 15560
Haven't read the whole thread BUT

I do believe this whole transgender issue is in early stages and men, women and trans need to figure out how this works with the sports world.

I hesitate to dictate a policy not being active in weightlifting.......but it all needs to be openly discussed and all angles looked at.

I think that it isn't transphobic to have concerns of what it means for sports. I think it is honest and real to acknowledge all of this has to be addressed by the athletes, the governing bodies and society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 05:54 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,592 posts, read 18,208,471 times
Reputation: 15566
How come women who become men don't compete with the real men.? because they would surely lose. This is why men who become women compete, because they have the greatest chance to win .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 06:51 PM
 
3,047 posts, read 5,007,978 times
Reputation: 3324
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzy jeff View Post
Data has shown trans female runners times and marks reduce on average of about 12 percent after a year of HRT. That puts them right in the range of a female.
How about Olympic weightlifting records?
  • Men's 56kg: 307kg
  • Women's 58kg: 246kg
  • Difference: 61kg/20%
  • Men's 62kg: 327kg
  • Women's 63kg: 262kg
  • Difference: 65kg/20%
  • Men's 69kg: 357kg
  • Women's 69kg: 275kg
  • Difference: 82kg/22%

And of course, the category in which she is competing:
  • Men's Superheavy: 473kg
  • Women's Superheavy: 333kg
  • Difference: 140kg/30%


Also, an average of 12%, what's the std dev? how many don't lose 12%?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Phila & NYC
4,783 posts, read 3,307,997 times
Reputation: 1953
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
Many democrats deny the science that there are significant biological differences between men and women.
Stop! Nothing to do with Political Parties.
Testosterone drives many of those biological differences. Suppress the testosterone and many of the advantages go away.
Go back and read my post on collegiate trans athletes, and then tell me why they were not all D1 athletes on scholarships.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,043 posts, read 22,214,532 times
Reputation: 13855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
This calls up the familiar arguments of "She was born a male and thus has some unfair advantages" and "No, that shouldn't make any difference as long as she meets the medical requirements".

I can see this only becoming more common in the future. My bet is that the transgender athletes will eventually win their case over opposing arguments:

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/olympic...082503551.html
Fine, then give them their own league. Don't lump biological men in with biological women and claim they are all women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2021, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,043 posts, read 22,214,532 times
Reputation: 13855
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzy jeff View Post
Stop! Nothing to do with Political Parties.
Testosterone drives many of those biological differences. Suppress the testosterone and many of the advantages go away.
Go back and read my post on collegiate trans athletes, and then tell me why they were not all D1 athletes on scholarships.
Stop asking them to follow the science, because it confuses them, they only "follow the science" when they think it might help them win an argument. When following the science does not seem to help win their argument, then they ignore the science. They left are like a cult, the cult follows no rules, only lurches from one emotional messaging meme to the next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top