Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2021, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
Clearly, there was fraud in some states but not others. You know darn well that there are states where Biden won and no one on either side is claiming fraud. Stop pretending otherwise.
Well that much we can agree on, Biden supporters don't go complaining about fraud in states that Trump won. The complaint is this laser like focus on just the a few counties and states where Trump lost. If there was systematic fraud it should have been widespread easily detectable and not just limited to the presidential race. So far Texas has one case of fraud, Colorado has one, are there others?

To get to this level 6 months after the election there should be verifiable fraud to a degree that would require this level of scutiny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2021, 04:37 PM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,474,011 times
Reputation: 9440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well that much we can agree on, Biden supporters don't go complaining about fraud in states that Trump won. The complaint is this laser like focus on just the a few counties and states where Trump lost. If there was systematic fraud it should have been widespread easily detectable and not just limited to the presidential race. So far Texas has one case of fraud, Colorado has one, are there others?

To get to this level 6 months after the election there should be verifiable fraud to a degree that would require this level of scutiny.
There are others. 3 here in Pa. and they were supporters of the twice impeached one.

https://www.newsweek.com/man-charged...lvania-1556553
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2021, 06:22 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pgh guy View Post
I would think it would be up to each individual house and senate candidates to ask for a re-check.
The boards of election in the various states already have a threshold for a recount and audit, it's automatic but a candidate can always request a recount.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2021, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Were state election laws followed in some states? No. So why bother recounting votes if the entire voting process was unlawfully conducted in the first place? It's like thinking it matters if we review the test scores on a math test, when we know some of the test takers were allowed to use calculators, and even allowed to wait a day after everyone else took the test before they had to present their answers.
Most of the states changed their election laws and it was bipartisan, one state did produce a challenge in court but lost. The point is fraud and they had been unable to validate their claims, the main thrust of the recounts and audits was fraud.

So what is the point of this 6 months after the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2021, 02:25 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansible90 View Post
How, exactly does that work? If someone gives a bogus address, the ballot would be mailed and then returned by the post office. How would the person get the ballot to send it back by mail.



You don't have relatives living in other parts of the country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2021, 05:26 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,385,616 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
Yet once again --- It's out there. Again, when anyone provides links, you and your ilk refuse to look at them if they aren't from the MSM. Not only that, those who provide links get ridiculed.

Do your own research with an open mind. Can you do that? I'm not doing your work for you
Allegations, rumor and inuendo are not evidence.

Where is the evidence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2021, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,982 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Every single scenario, except one in PA regarding how late they could accept and count mail-in ballots, was deemed to be within the parameters of the applicable laws by the state courts in question. So.......
So? That's all you think were the changes made to state election laws? Here's just a few you left out:

In Michigan, their Secretary of State made changes to the standards ”for reviewing signatures, verifying signatures, and curing missing or mismatched signatures." She did not have the authority to do that

Virginia state law prohibited ballots without postmarks from being counted. But the Board of Elections illegally implemented election law changes allowing ballots to be counted even if they arrived without a postmark, and up to three days after the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2021, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,982 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Most of the states changed their election laws and it was bipartisan, one state did produce a challenge in court but lost. The point is fraud and they had been unable to validate their claims, the main thrust of the recounts and audits was fraud.

So what is the point of this 6 months after the election.
The point is, we have election laws laid out in state Constitutions and laws passed and signed into law by state legislatures. Unelected people sitting on boards, governors and a Secretary of State do not have the power to arbitrarily rewrite election laws and rules on the fly, just days before an election. It should not matter which political party you belong to. How can we have faith in honest elections if the laws and rules are meaningless?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2021, 02:45 PM
 
22,473 posts, read 12,003,345 times
Reputation: 20398
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Allegations, rumor and inuendo are not evidence.

Where is the evidence?
Go find it for yourself. It has to be that way. You darn well know that whatever links I give you, you will refuse to read them.

It's abundantly clear that you haven't taken the time to fully look at both sides of the coin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2021, 02:58 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11130
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Allegations, rumor and inuendo are not evidence.

Where is the evidence?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cin...es-in-november



Quote:
She admitted voting twice in the presidential election last November, and now, Obama supporter Melowese Richardson has been indicted for allegedly voting at least six times. She also is charged with illegal voting in 2008 and 2011.
Now, you are going to say, well that just one person voting 6 times with others votes.

Because it's no reported, does not mean it did not happen.

Go ahead, you never asked for an amount.....but lets hear your response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top