Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
High income people though pay attention to which pols will minimize their tax rates, vs who will raise their taxes.
Yeah sure. Why Republicans were screaming NOT when tax law was snuck through by both parties to require those inheriting taxable IRA's (mostly the owners kids) to empty those accounts within 10 years and pay taxes rather than based on their life expectancies.
This matter should not be in the supreme courts hands. Listen to Kavanaugh’s statement. He specifies the court should have neutrality in this case. Meaning this matter should be taken up by the people and their elected officials. He was the only justice that had it correct. In fact, the only argument here is not if abortion should be illegal, but what is the definition of viability? How on God’s green earth should that decision be left to the court? Where is their expertise in this matter? Furthermore, this matter has nothing to do with the constitution whatsoever. The term “Liberty” in this matter has been stretched to mean just about anything even the killing of helpless human beings.
I absolutely agree with you but this is what it's come down to. It's up to the supreme court now. They just need to leave roe v wade in place.
They need to not leave Roe in place, as it was Federal overreach, and no more worthy of staying intact as Plessy vs Ferguson was.
If we can't take care of the hundreds of thousand kids already in foster then why would you want to add more. If we want them to be born then we have to pay for the mother's healthcare during her pregnancy and once the baby is born. If she's homeless then we have to pay for a safe place for her and her child. If she is unable to work then we have to pay more taxes for her welfare. If you want to do this then fine, but I don't want to pay for any of this.
Local control equates to unequal rights, a patchwork. If rights are not consistent across the country, then why bother being a country, at all?
Our founding fathers properly knew local should rule, whenever there was not an overwhelming reason not to.
All powers not granted the federal government reside in the states. It's quite easy to knock those in power locally out if they fail to obey the will of the people in their regions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
