Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2022, 07:56 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,619,822 times
Reputation: 8094

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordBronco1967 View Post
This is why I support a Constitutional Convention to add a 'Balanced Budget Amendment'. This is what we needed to do yesterday, too.
LOL. A balanced budget simply means more taxes and more spending.

A good way is adding another condition: no more than x% of the gdp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2022, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,323,113 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach43ofus View Post
#1 Interest payments on our national debt will slowly rise by $150,000,000,000, as new debt is issued at the new higher rate, & as short-term debt is moved to long-term debt.

So what?

Well, to pay for the newly added interest expense, we can:

A) cut spending by $150 Billion to offset this new added expense

B) raise taxes to pay for it, which slows economic growth

C) print more Monopoly money, adding to our money supply aka "M1"


If we choose A), cut spending, where will Congress cut $150B from? Is Congress even capable of cutting $150B in spending?

If we choose B), raise taxes, Biden will have to renig on his promise not to raise taxes on people who make <$400k. 99.38% of Americans make <$400k, which leaves only .62% of Americans to increase taxes on to get the $150B from. Or, they can increase corporate taxes, which causes corporations to raise prices, which increases inflation.

If we choose C), printing more Monopoly money, it will fuel even more inflation:

https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-h...amples-3306097

https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7...ses-inflation/

What should the Fed, Congress, and Joe Biden do, and why?
None of this is to disagree that we should have gotten our financial house in order the 2nd half of Obama & during Trump, and recognized that the interest ray the USG pays on the National Debt wouldn't be near 0% forever.

However, is there any indication that corporations reduced prices when they got a 40% reduction in their income tax rate? Or that it even suppressed price increases?

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FCTAX

in 2016, CIT (corp inc tax) generated $312B in taxes. In 2017 CIT generated $245B, by 2019 it was $217B, despite continued success at the corporate level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,323,113 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
imagine if we only spent 565 Billion on our military and made it focus on defending us instead of the 715 billion we spend to be the world police.

I will say this-Trump was right about getting other NATO nations to contribute as they are supposed too.
I would imagine that whatever figure is appropriate for defense as opposed to "world cop and defender" would be agreeable to most people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:05 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,343 posts, read 16,448,987 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlakeJones View Post
Mortgage rates spiking, now at 4.10%:
https://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mo.../30-year-fixed

that is close to a 3 year high. This will easily go over 5% and the sky is the limit if the fed keeps raising
The average 30 year note was 4.9% in 2018. I don't remember the cries of "the sky is falling!" back then.

"Over 5%" would still have mortgages below what they were at any time between 1971 and around 2010. Big whoop.


https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=NUh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:06 AM
 
22,051 posts, read 9,632,459 times
Reputation: 19567
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
imagine if we only spent 565 Billion on our military and made it focus on defending us instead of the 715 billion we spend to be the world police.

I will say this-Trump was right about getting other NATO nations to contribute as they are supposed too.
Wow, we actually agree on something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:07 AM
 
22,051 posts, read 9,632,459 times
Reputation: 19567
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
The Fed has raised interest rates many times before without anybody else having to do anything else, and the sky has not fallen. Why should this time be any different?
Because the last time they did it, we didn't have $30 TRILLION in debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:08 AM
 
22,051 posts, read 9,632,459 times
Reputation: 19567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
I’ll give you this - you have correctly identified the fact that Presidents, and government in general, can’t do much to control the economy. Recessions, stock markets, unemployment should not be blamed or credited to the President.

What the Fed should do is follow up with more interest rate hikes until inflation comes back down to reasonable territory. Rescind the Trump tax cuts to ameliorate effects on the deficit. As you said, tax increases slow economic growth, which is our problem right now. Inflation = too much growth.
You're delusional. The reason for the rampant inflation is the excessive spending and the war on fossil fuels. Both on Biden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:13 AM
 
10,658 posts, read 7,161,536 times
Reputation: 11769
Markets are pricing in the Fed raises, the question is how many? How much?

We might get into a situation where the Fed raises rates, but the 10 yr Treasury falls which would actually bring mortgage rates back down.

My advice to anyone, if you have cash put it into assets.

Also, we dodged a bullet with the Build Back Better bill being cancelled, inflation would have been unimaginable with Bidens plan to print off another $4T which is legalized theft to the working class. Unfortunately there are many uneducated people on economics out there that keep voting Democrat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:18 AM
 
Location: New York City
19,105 posts, read 12,797,859 times
Reputation: 14811
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
The average 30 year note was 4.9% in 2018. I don't remember the cries of "the sky is falling!" back then.

"Over 5%" would still have mortgages below what they were at any time between 1971 and around 2010. Big whoop.


https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=NUh
Yes money is still cheap. If rates go way up easy money will evaporate and the economy is going to tank as high debt borrowers can't push off their reckoning anymore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2022, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Southeast US
8,609 posts, read 2,323,113 times
Reputation: 2114
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
The Fed has raised interest rates many times before without anybody else having to do anything else, and the sky has not fallen. Why should this time be any different?
This can be easily simplified to explain. It's the amount of deficit spending that has increased the National Debt.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DTB3
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEBTN

Simplified:

Right before Bush 2: Debt $5.7T, 90-day Treasury rate 5.73% = $326B in interest

5% is the approx average over time of what the rate has been.

But when Bush left office, the Debt had pretty much doubled (wars + beginning of Great Recession) to $10.7T, and the Fed had pushed that interest rate down to 0.11%.

For 9 years, the rate stayed in the tenths of 1%.

By the time Obama left office, the debt had almost doubled AGAIN and now stood at $20T but the rate was the same. So yes, we're starting to pay a LOT of interest, but at a ridiculously low rate.

And now that we stand, just 5 years later, at an unofficial $28.4T debt - about 5x more than just 20 years ago - that we have to pay interest on, a 1% increase in what we have to pay = $284B.

Quote:
"without anybody else having to do anything else, and the sky has not fallen.
that's because the National Debt wasn't such a massive number.

So, regardless of whatever else we would "like" the Federal government to spend money on, it has to pay interest on the debt. We've "gotten off easy" for ~14 years by the interest rate being a fraction of the historical average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top