Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So American soldiers breathing in toxic smoke from burn pits elicits glee and joy from this loon?
Pelosi does not drink.
I tend not to watch SOTUA theatre. I used to get a kick out of flipping between cable news stations after the address when it appeared they had not watched the same address, regardless of who sat the oval. Media that favored the sitting president gushed while opposing media made jokes. It was nothing more than extension of the theatre.
I cut the cord last April and have never looked back.
Biden has been fighting against Fox, Breitbart, Newsmax and others all along. Now he's fighting against the mainstream too.
I watched on NBC (Doesn't matter who, it was just the speech) but I left it on for the commentary, and they were pretty hard on him, for stuff I thought was pretty picky. They obsessed on the "go get 'em" at the end of the speech, trying to act like it was some sort of coded comment. Anyone in his right mind knew it was an attempt to rally the US Audience. "go get 'em". Maybe a poor attempt, but them acting like it was code for "get Putin" or somethign. That is the kind of stuff you all would have been irate if they said about a Trump speech.
This biased press thing is a tired story. All POTUSs get critique, and from all sides. They get it more from one side than the other, depending on a lot of things, but to act like it's lop-sided is an old, tired lie.
Funny how all of the sudden the biased press becomes a "tired" story as soon as they start to show some disapproval of the current administration. But even with that disapproval, it is softballs compared to what Trump had faced. And I am sure that Breitbart and Newsmax would be very happy that they are now considered "MSM" though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost
My biggest disappointment from Biden is when he referred to "the prior admin". That is divisive, and yesterday's news. Talk about what YOU can do, not what the other guy didn't do. (Don't get me wrong, Trump did that 10x as much, but I hold a higher bar for just about any human than Trump.)
And yet I bet you don't see the irony in that statement. As a vast majority of your post I was replying to was an attempt on your part to say how much better Biden was over the Previous Administration.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myghost
One thing for sure: Anyone who saw that speech from beginning to end, who understands Biden's Speech Impediment which is well documented, cannot be questioning his mental acuity. THey can disagree with him, call him names, say he is good or bad, but the dude was all there, understood what he was talking about, and was beyond coherent. He had a lot of trip-ups on words, but it was obvious that was just his issue with speech, which has been life-long.
The dude was all there??? Well, I guess anyone who says that Biden is just cleaning up Trump's mess in Ukraine I can see why you would think that.
But with the number of issues, he had during the SOTU I think the term "all there" is probably very relative.
I will have to say one thing though...one thing Pelosi's actions did was to divert a little attention away from the guy in front of her. So perhaps it was planned as some sort of lightning rod.
I tend not to watch SOTUA theatre. I used to get a kick out of flipping between cable news stations after the address when it appeared they had not watched the same address, regardless of who sat the oval. Media that favored the sitting president gushed while opposing media made jokes. It was nothing more than extension of the theatre.
I cut the cord last April and have never looked back.
There is life beyond partisan nonsense.
i havent watched a cable or TV news source in ten or twenty years..the internet is a much better source
So can you explain Pelosi's weird hand rubbing and glee when Biden was talking about smoke toxicity to American soldiers?
I'm fine with hearing "democrat good", but for the life of me, with all of Biden's disasters, I just can't seem to find any.
Perhaps you can explain the virtues of smoke inhalation to soldiers that would elicit such joy? I understand that the cult of liberalism prevents you from criticizing any dem behavior, no matter how bizarre, but smoke inhalation? Are you nuts?
Your OP was bizarre and vapid. And you don't care about our military personnel. If you did, you wouldn't support the war mongers who put them in harms way over something which has nothing to do with protecting our borders.
Oh but look at Nancy. Look, look. See Nancy. See funny Nancy and Joe.
The Stare of the Union not the State of the Union ? Hahahahahaha............................
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
