Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And everybody knows the IRS can't do anything without Tish James' approval.
And everyone knows that Tish James already collected the documents that show tax fraud, and passed the info on to the IRS. No approval required. Just a sharing of incriminating evidence.
And everyone knows that Tish James already collected the documents that show tax fraud, and passed the info on to the IRS. No approval required. Just a sharing of incriminating evidence.
And everyone knows that Tish James already collected the documents that show tax fraud, and passed the info on to the IRS. No approval required. Just a sharing of incriminating evidence.
Quite the assumption. Proof to her showing evidence of tax fraud? After all, he’d already be charged if they were given proof to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultor
And everybody knows the IRS can't do anything without Tish James' approval.
Thanks for the effort. I didn’t mean for you to go to that kind of trouble. I thought you might have remembered who published it.
As far as “left-approved.” There are news gathering organizations and opinion blogs on both sides. I try to stay clear of any of them that spin or fabricate everything they publish to feed red meat to their demographics. I have frequently used Fox, and occasionally Breitbart for reference.
Keeping it middle of the road is always A good idea to get a point across, because that is where the majority lives.
well, I wouldn't use HuffPo anymore than I'd use Breitbart (other than the links within Breitbart to the actual source of news). I was talking NYT, WaPo, NPR, MSN, MSNBC, AP.
the entire point was I would have sworn I read "federal court" for Weisselberg and dispute(d) Bragg doing any convincing. But I see I've been corrected and it was state court.
The allegations are fraud against his lenders. If you overinflate the value of your collateral you can qualify for larger loans and/or smaller interest rates on those loans.
are you going to give us the page # citation of the lawsuit where the Banks have provided this info?
Cash-poor Trump may have to dump his skyscrapers at 'fire sale' prices if he loses NY fraud lawsuit: biographer
Appearing on MSNBC on Sunday afternoon, Donald Trump biographer and senior executive editor of Bloomberg Opinion, Tim O'Brien, claimed that, should the former president go head-to-head with New York Attorney General Letitia O'Brien and lose the $250 million lawsuit she has filed against him, he will likely have to liquidate his properties --and at fire sale prices.
Speaking with MSNBC host Alex Witt, O'Brien suggested that Trump's worth is wrapped up in his real estate portfolio and he doesn't have access to enough cash to pay penalties and fines if he loses his court battle.
Trump didn't call Georgia telling them to find more votes for him? Trump didn't inflate/deflate property values? Trump didn't have classified documents? If it is all lies it should be no problem right, judges and juries of his peers will laugh all these accusers out of court.
I bet if your nose was wiped with the document where he signed off saying his 11,000 sq foot apartment was 30,000 sq feet you would still say he did nothing wrong, correct?
which document was that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
