Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Performers don't control who enters a venue. They can specify age limits, but they don't have the capacity to enforce them - because they're busy, you know, performing. That's up to the venue, and to the parents of young children. Any outrage should be directed to the appropriate persons.
Age requirements exist in many venues and events. This should have been an over 18 show yet there were toddlers there. They absolutely can and do enforce age limits in venues. The performer and the venue should probably be on the same page and even if not, if the performer comes out in nothing but a thong with huge fake boobs and sees little kids in the audience, they should probably consider putting on a shirt and some pants. Not prancing around like a stripper among small children.
Age requirements exist in many venues and events. This should have been an over 18 show yet there were toddlers there. They absolutely can and do enforce age limits in venues. The performer and the venue should probably be on the same page and even if not, if the performer comes out in nothing but a thong with huge fake boobs and sees little kids in the audience, they should probably consider putting on a shirt and some pants. Not prancing around like a stripper among small children.
The performer is there to preform for the audience it isn’t their responsibility to change their act. As a audience member if you don’t like the performance the offended can leave
Age requirements exist in many venues and events. This should have been an over 18 show yet there were toddlers there.
Once again, the outrage is misplaced. Performers don't enforce who comes into the venue. Performers can specify no one under 18, for instance, but they don't stand at the door policing who comes in.
Quote:
They absolutely can and do enforce age limits in venues.
And that is the venue's responsibility. And the parents' responsibility to not take their kids to performances that are inappropriate for kids.
You are characterizing the “LGBTQ movement” as a whole of heinous behavior with generalizations. I’m merely reflecting that back to you where it occurs more frequently.
Of the examples I gave you only specifically picked out child beauty pageants and condemned those, so by your standard you support all the others.
You have not read my posts.
If a priest who is half naked wears a loin cloth and shakes his a$$ at young children, it's disgusting.
If a drag queen who is half naked and wears fake boobs and shakes his a$$ to to humpty hump music at young children, it's disgusting.
BOTH are disgusting.
You only think the first one is disgusting. Second one is OK. You've made that VERY CLEAR.
Once again, the outrage is misplaced. Performers don't enforce who comes into the venue. Performers can specify no one under 18, for instance, but they don't stand at the door policing who comes in.
And that is the venue's responsibility. And the parents' responsibility to not take their kids to performances that are inappropriate for kids.
Then why aren't venues enforcing "family friendly"?
At a recent "family friendly" pride event where the LGBTQ organization got a permit from the city to use the park, a vendor had d I l D os out in public, where children were walking by.
The community was outraged and rightly so. Because of the incident, the city is rewriting the parks permit agreement to make sure it is clear what "family friendly" means.
So this type of sexualized nonsense does not appear at any other LGBTQ event billed "family friendly." Because they are the only events that have this type of crap.
I've never attended an Italian Festival, Beach Festival, Holiday Festival, BBQ Bash, etc., where a vendor was selling d I l D os.
Have you? Seen a sex toys table at the local Oktoberfest? Memorial Day celebration?
And it's IDIOTIC that they city had been forced to do this, as every non-grooming adult knows that d I l D os do not belong at a family friendly event, which means it was done ON PURPOSE.
The performer is there to preform for the audience it isn’t their responsibility to change their act. As a audience member if you don’t like the performance the offended can leave
Once again, the outrage is misplaced. Performers don't enforce who comes into the venue. Performers can specify no one under 18, for instance, but they don't stand at the door policing who comes in.
And that is the venue's responsibility. And the parents' responsibility to not take their kids to performances that are inappropriate for kids.
Don’t be silly your scenario said the venue had established age requirements. A parent that sees entertainment that is inappropriate for their children should leave. How hard is that to understand?
Why do 20% of the next generation believe that they are LGBTQ?
Because they've been TOLD to.
The goal is to normalize deviant behaviors. Simple as that!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And the parents' responsibility to not take their kids to performances that are inappropriate for kids. 