Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Which is exactly what we have said all along. Had there been anything on the computer the FBI could confirm to be earth shattering, i.e. government secrets, treason, or kiddie porn, we would have heard from them a long time ago,
Investigate to the max, and if proof of a crime is found that stands up in court, prosecute to the max, regardless of political affiliation.
I don't believe even you can possible be that naïve, the FBI is working for the democrat party, not for the American people. They are a wing of the left, that is why they covered up the crime.
Thanks the Elon, the game is up and heads will roll, whether you continue to support and make excuses for the Marxist left or not. There are many more secrets to come out, they are being revealed slowly to give the ignorant lovers of communist who make excuses for them, to be able to comprehend the content.
You should welcome the truth and to have a corrupt government exposed if you have any feeling at all for America. I know you can't be helped, you prove that over and over with every post..
But I also know that I'm literally the only one. Everyone of my generation hangs on these platforms (I'm fairly young) non-stop.
You are *literally* not the only one. I have a Twitter account, have had it since 2008. I hardly use it, and when I do, it's usually to get a coupon or discount code from a vendor for an online purchase. I use my account maybe a few times a year, and don't follow politics.
I know lots of people who don't use Twitter and can't be bothered with yet another waste of time since Facebook took over. Now there's Tik Tok (which is not Twitter) and Instagram (which is not Twitter) and many other social platforms.
But the main point is this: Twitter owns the platform, period. Twitter controls their platform. Just like C-D owns their platform and determines who can post and what they can/can't say, ALL these platforms have a TOS, and users are bound by those. There is no such thing as "freedom of speech" on social media--users are always bound by the TOS by those who own/run the platform the user is choosing to use. Users can be muted, silenced temporarily or permanently, banned outright, their content can be deleted, and they have no recourse.
Reading about this Tabbi guy -- seems nobody likes him or thinks he has integrity...why would he be the chosen one?
Is it because he isn't liked byt he left or right?
1. Taibbi is an outcast, iconoclast, oddball, and both a small l and big L liberal. There can be no claim that he's a republican shill. As someone on the autism spectrum I'm guessing Musk likes outcasts.
2. Taibbi is an astonishingly good writer. He's one of a tiny handful for reporter-types who often writes about finance and economics without making a fool of himself.
You are *literally* not the only one. I have a Twitter account, have had it since 2008. I hardly use it, and when I do, it's usually to get a coupon or discount code from a vendor for an online purchase. I use my account maybe a few times a year, and don't follow politics.
I know lots of people who don't use Twitter and can't be bothered with yet another waste of time since Facebook took over. Now there's Tik Tok (which is not Twitter) and Instagram (which is not Twitter) and many other social platforms.
But the main point is this: Twitter owns the platform, period. Twitter controls their platform. Just like C-D owns their platform and determines who can post and what they can/can't say, ALL these platforms have a TOS, and users are bound by those. There is no such thing as "freedom of speech" on social media--users are always bound by the TOS by those who own/run the platform the user is choosing to use. Users can be muted, silenced temporarily or permanently, banned outright, their content can be deleted, and they have no recourse.
I don't follow politics from the person posting in the politics forum.
Interesting. How does that work?
Also, you are missing the point of what was revealed. The government was interfering with the private companies policies. The government threatened the private companies to do their bidding, else suffer government action.
1) It's well beyond Twitter. It's FB, Google and the MSM.
2) While you state the 1st amendment does not apply to private corporations, it is VERY ILLEGAL for the Federal Government to direct those private corporations to prevent certain speech and push their speech instead.
THAT'S the big story now.
Maybe YOU should read the constitution to fully understand it.
I'll wait to see evidence, not hyperbole from MAGAnuts.
Btw, I did study the constitution in a law class I had in undergrad. It was a required class. Most people have no clue what's in the constitution, including the former guy, who couldn't pass a Jr. High Civics test if his life depended on it.
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,619 posts, read 12,543,921 times
Reputation: 10483
Quote:
Originally Posted by lottamoxie
You are *literally* not the only one. I have a Twitter account, have had it since 2008. I hardly use it, and when I do, it's usually to get a coupon or discount code from a vendor for an online purchase. I use my account maybe a few times a year, and don't follow politics.
I know lots of people who don't use Twitter and can't be bothered with yet another waste of time since Facebook took over. Now there's Tik Tok (which is not Twitter) and Instagram (which is not Twitter) and many other social platforms.
But the main point is this: Twitter owns the platform, period. Twitter controls their platform. Just like C-D owns their platform and determines who can post and what they can/can't say, ALL these platforms have a TOS, and users are bound by those. There is no such thing as "freedom of speech" on social media--users are always bound by the TOS by those who own/run the platform the user is choosing to use. Users can be muted, silenced temporarily or permanently, banned outright, their content can be deleted, and they have no recourse.
It would be okay with you if those in government contact C-D to request (aka, demand) that certain posts be removed in the political forum?
So the gist is, Trump, the most powerful man in the world, who had stacked the Supreme Court, who had appointed 'yes men' to virtually every important position in at least two of the three government branches, who was busy building relationships with North Korea and Russia, who claimed to be unbelievably intelligent and knew more about almost everything than everybody... Allowed a few anti-Trump people make him loose being re elected? That just doesn't seem possible.
Trump called it out...all the time. "Fake News" and all that.
He even called it out during the debates.
That's what bothers him (and others) most, I'm sure. They did it right in their face...and then said, "You lost", "You're a Election Denier", etc
They even suspended the account of his Press Secretary!
They constantly put forth lies about Trump to mislead the public...and covered up negative facts about Biden to further mislead.
That results in a election that is not fair & free.
The question now...what to do about it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
