Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"I don't understand. But I don't care, so it works out."
(set 20 days ago)
35,676 posts, read 18,045,481 times
Reputation: 50732
Quote:
Originally Posted by SerlingHitchcockJPeele
The Democrats stupidest “stop Trump” attempt yet. Riddle me this: How is someone, who has been **ACQUITTED** of insurrection in a public trial for all to see, still guilty of the crime?
Democrat logic: a person acquitted of murder is still a murderer. That’s basically the argument they’re using against Trump. Good luck, your tears will taste yummy!
You can't be serious. There are a LOT of people who are acquitted in a public trial who are completely guilty of the crime for which they were tried.
The Democrats stupidest “stop Trump” attempt yet. Riddle me this: How is someone, who has been **ACQUITTED** of insurrection in a public trial for all to see, still guilty of the crime?
Democrat logic: a person acquitted of murder is still a murderer. That’s basically the argument they’re using against Trump. Good luck, your tears will taste yummy!
An impeachment is not a legal action. It's purely political, and has no bearing on any actual exercise of the law.
The appeal is asking for clarification of the legal aspects of insurrection.
An impeachment is not a legal action. It's purely political, and has no bearing on any actual exercise of the law.
The appeal is asking for clarification of the legal aspects of insurrection.
What insurrection? NO ONE has been charged with insurrection in regards to Jan 6.
NO participants = NO insurrection
Furthermore, SCOTUS granted cert (agreed to hear the case) based on the Trump legal team's assertion that states lack jurisdiction to enforce 14th Amendment ineligibility as Section 5 mandates that CONGRESS has that power.
What insurrection? NO ONE has been charged with insurrection in regards to Jan 6.
NO participants = NO insurrection
Furthermore, SCOTUS granted cert (agreed to hear the case) based on the Trump legal team's assertion that states lack jurisdiction to enforce 14th Amendment ineligibility as Section 5 mandates that CONGRESS has that power.
The insurrection that COSC says Trump led. That’s why SCOTUS is involved.
A. SCOTUS likes states rights. There is an overall Seditious conspiracy leader. That would be Trump through Stone.
Like any mob boss the orders go down from the top.
The insurrection that COSC says Trump led. That’s why SCOTUS is involved.
Trump's legal team has correctly made the case that Colorado lacks jurisdiction to enforce 14th Amendment ineligibility due to Section 5, and the DOJ has declined to use the mechanism Congress legislated to enforce it (18 US Code § 2383) because they have no evidence. That's why SCOTUS granted cert (agreed to hear the case).
Trump's legal team has correctly made the case that Colorado lacks jurisdiction to enforce 14th Amendment ineligibility due to Section 5, and the DOJ has declined to use the mechanism Congress legislated to enforce it (18 US Code § 2383) because they have no evidence. That's why SCOTUS granted cert (agreed to hear the case).
Go back and check out the article I linked to in post #27.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
