Every single Senate Dem voted NO on an amendment to prohibit YOUR tax dollars from funding flights for illegal aliens

[uggabugga]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Seems more trustworthy and credible than Haggerty and his secret program theory.

are you claiming there is no such program to quietly fly hundreds of thousands of 'migrants' into the country?

[Vector1]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Seems more trustworthy and credible than Haggerty and his secret program theory.

I know you were replying to a different poster, but Snpoes is known to have been leftwing from the start by the husband/wife team that started it, and has only gotten worse while being funded by wealthy leftists.
Heck remember the stance the wife took on the person who called the cops on a vendor who was selling flags, and had confederate flags for sale. Accordingly, the police should have arrested the vendor.
Why is it that despite leftists claiming the right are fascist, it is the left who wants to use fascist tactics to silence the people they disagree with?

Frankly, most of the so called fact checkers have political/ideological biases, and most of them are on the left.
Politifact is a perfect example, as it began in 2007 as a project of the Tampa Bay Times.
Whether you are aware of it or not, the TBT has not endorsed a (R) nominee for potus for over 60 years.
Think about that, landslide losers like McGovern, Dukakis were endorsed by them, so what are the odds their project was going to be unbiased and fair.
If that doesn't convince you I don't know what would, other than to say if some fact checking source by a newspaper hadn't endorsed a single (D) nominee for over 60 years and landslide losers like Goldwater or Dole got their endorsement, would open my eyes.

Back to the topic at hand, did you see the video I posted of Bill Clinton using the term illegal aliens, and more importantly articulating all the problems associated with them?
I am sure he was your guy in the 90's, but in todays context, he couldn't get elected dog catcher in the modern day looney (D) party.

[Ohiogirl81]

Originally Posted by Vector1

Frankly, most of the so called fact checkers have political/ideological biases, and most of them are on the left.

I guess "the left" must be the only group interested in facts, then, right?

Politifact is a perfect example, as it began in 2007 as a project of the Tampa Bay Times.
Whether you are aware of it or not, the TBT has not endorsed a (R) nominee for potus for over 60 years.
Think about that, landslide losers like McGovern, Dukakis were endorsed by them, so what are the odds their project was going to be unbiased and fair.

Your fatal flaw here is confusing opinion with fact. An endorsement of a presidential candidate is an opinion presented by the newspaper's editorial board. A fact checking project does not present opinion, it presents facts (hence the name). News organizations are capable of presenting both fact and opinion.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by uggabugga

are you claiming there is no such program to quietly fly hundreds of thousands of 'migrants' into the country?

How does he "secretly fly in" 320,000 immigrants, is he paying out of pocket? The money has to come from somewhere, all he has to do is find out where the funding is coming from to pay for the charter jets. How does he hide that many flights from public view, if it's secret how did Haggerty find out?


There has been a refugee resettlement program for decades through the state department, is that what he is talking about?

https://www.state.gov/refugee-admissions/

[Vector1]

Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81

I guess "the left" must be the only group interested in facts, then, right?
Your fatal flaw here is confusing opinion with fact. An endorsement of a presidential candidate is an opinion presented by the newspaper's editorial board. A fact checking project does not present opinion, it presents facts (hence the name). News organizations are capable of presenting both fact and opinion.

You might believe that, if for no other reason the TBT just like the NYT is far left, and anything project they start is going to be tainted. I point out how far left they are based on potus endorsements, and yet you somehow think there is some magical division between ownership, the editorial board and other divisions within the company.

But hey, don't take my word for it, there are plenty of examples you can find if you look at it with an unbiased lens where they have claimed things to be factual or false with a clear left slant.

That said, how on earth can you justify the modern day (D) party juxtaposed to the Bill Clinton Democrat days that in some cases are 180 with illegal aliens being but one example?