Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2008, 12:48 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Previous months numbers are always adjusted and reported. You just have to read them. The government does not give any rationale for the adjustments. I guess they estimate them and then readjust when the actual numbers are counted.
The BLS employment numbers are based on two surveys -- one of about 60,000 households and another of about 400,000 worksites. These are done every month during either the week or the pay period in which the 12th day of the month falls. The data are the data. Those for the prior month do not change as the result of the next. What does change from month to month is the calculation of seasonal adjustment factors. Employment data have signficant seasonality in them, just as the end of school in June and the hiring of temps for the Xmas season would suggest. The new month's seasonality factors are applied to household data for the current month only. For the establishment data (the number that's typically reported by MSM), the new factors are applied to the three most recent months. Once a year, revised factors are applied to the entire preceding year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The BLS numbers don't lie but the adjustments have been changing so the resultant number is not always reality.
How would anyone know what reality actually is? The BLS numbers are by far the best and most comprehensive data and analysis that are available. What I'm hearing is people looking at a perfectly good thermometer and seeing that it's 28 degrees outside, and then saying Boy, it sure feels colder than that! Only some, however, will follow that up with Stupid thermometer!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2008, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,014,195 times
Reputation: 36644
I would like to see figures on how many many hours of work are performed per household.

Say, in a neighborhood of two houses:
A has a man with a full-time job, and a part time job, and his wife works full time.
B has a man and wife, both unemployed, both looking for work.

Average hours of work, per household, is 50 hours. Average number of jobs per household is 1.5. Unemployment rate for the neighborhood is 50%. Which statistic shall shall we use to evaluate the health of the neighborhood's economy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 01:03 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,449,435 times
Reputation: 55563
in 93 we found that high unemployment rates were good for many people (not the jobless, the others, you know the marie antoinette crowd).
10% misery makes life good for the other 90%. obama 08.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
The BLS employment numbers are based on two surveys -- one of about 60,000 households and another of about 400,000 worksites. These are done every month during either the week or the pay period in which the 12th day of the month falls. The data are the data. Those for the prior month do not change as the result of the next. What does change from month to month is the calculation of seasonal adjustment factors. Employment data have signficant seasonality in them, just as the end of school in June and the hiring of temps for the Xmas season would suggest. The new month's seasonality factors are applied to household data for the current month only. For the establishment data (the number that's typically reported by MSM), the new factors are applied to the three most recent months. Once a year, revised factors are applied to the entire preceding year.


How would anyone know what reality actually is? The BLS numbers are by far the best and most comprehensive data and analysis that are available. What I'm hearing is people looking at a perfectly good thermometer and seeing that it's 28 degrees outside, and then saying Boy, it sure feels colder than that! Only some, however, will follow that up with Stupid thermometer!
We'll agree to disagree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 03:32 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
I would like to see figures on how many many hours of work are performed per household.
The standard BLS tables include Table B-2. Average weekly hours of production and nonsupervisory workers (1) on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector and selected industry detail. You'd have to adjust these data from a per-worker to a per-household basis from available household information.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Say, in a neighborhood of two houses:
A has a man with a full-time job, and a part time job, and his wife works full time.
B has a man and wife, both unemployed, both looking for work.

Average hours of work, per household, is 50 hours. Average number of jobs per household is 1.5. Unemployment rate for the neighborhood is 50%. Which statistic shall shall we use to evaluate the health of the neighborhood's economy?
There are outliers in (almost) any data set. If they are numerous or exaggerated in their effect, you can develop rules to exclude them. For the most part, they are swamped by the trends occurring in the non-outlier data. As long as you have a large enough sample size (two households isn't large enough), you should end up with results that are statistically significant...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 03:35 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,485,000 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
We'll agree to disagree.
So long as it's understood that what you are disagreeing with are the simple facts of the matter...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 04:48 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
So long as it's understood that what you are disagreeing with are the simple facts of the matter...
They are not so simple. The numbers have been massaged by "adjustments" over time. I don't believe they are true numbers.
I think this is what we are disagreeing on.

Numbers racket: Why the economy is worse than we know—By Kevin P. Phillips (Harper's Magazine)

Alternate Data Series
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 04:51 PM
 
Location: S.Florida
3,326 posts, read 5,342,700 times
Reputation: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by S6Sputnik View Post
The U.S. unemployment rate unexpectedly shot up to 6.1 percent in August, the highest in nearly five years, as employers cut payrolls for an eighth straight month and a decline in labor markets accelerated.
84000 jobs were lost in August!!!!!

I WANT CHANGE NOW NOT IN 4 YEARS
VOTE FOR CHANGE!

OBAMA 08
-------------

Are you telling me that chanting "USA USA" like they did at GOP convention won't fix the problems we have?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Neither candidate has addressed the economic problems or their platform to get the US out of debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 04:58 PM
 
Location: S.Florida
3,326 posts, read 5,342,700 times
Reputation: 343
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Neither candidate has addressed the economic problems or their platform to get the US out of debt.

Your right .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top