Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2008, 09:32 AM
 
1,570 posts, read 2,070,068 times
Reputation: 461

Advertisements

Not only for the OP, but because most homos dislike Ts'. Just as does the general population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2008, 09:39 AM
 
4,050 posts, read 6,140,921 times
Reputation: 1574
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
So is it for Asexuals?
Definitely. Or anyone else who fits into another category that is not heterosexual. Or people like me who think the labels are detrimental to begin with and would rather identify with a very broad one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 09:40 AM
 
4,050 posts, read 6,140,921 times
Reputation: 1574
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmarquise View Post
last time I checked.
Well then I would argue that that's why you're not Q. Just sayin' But then I'm not sure we were understanding each other there to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 09:41 AM
 
2,195 posts, read 3,641,185 times
Reputation: 893
Quote:
Originally Posted by 60-minutes-II View Post
Not only for the OP, but because most homos dislike Ts'. Just as does the general population.
Proof, instead of unsubstantiated conjecture, please?

Or, at least, evidence rather than unsupported claim?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 09:43 AM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,640,468 times
Reputation: 2893
Quote:
Originally Posted by buildings_and_bridges View Post
Definitely. Or anyone else who fits into another category that is not heterosexual. Or people like me who think the labels are detrimental to begin with and would rather identify with a very broad one.
Thanks for explaining it to me!

I can completely understand the desire not to be labeled, plus I have had a good friend who defined himself as asexual. I think that is more common than most people believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 09:48 AM
 
4,050 posts, read 6,140,921 times
Reputation: 1574
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
Thanks for explaining it to me!
Sure, it's just my perspective, but I've met quite a few people who feel the same way.

Quote:
I can completely understand the desire not to be labeled, plus I have had a good friend who defined himself as asexual. I think that is more common than most people believe.
You think so? I wonder sometimes. I'm not sure that I've ever met a genuinely asexual person who disclosed his or her orientation to me. I'm not saying it's not valid, because I believe it certainly is an orientation, but I've been assuming it's really rare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 10:02 AM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,640,468 times
Reputation: 2893
Quote:
Originally Posted by buildings_and_bridges View Post
Sure, it's just my perspective, but I've met quite a few people who feel the same way.

You think so? I wonder sometimes. I'm not sure that I've ever met a genuinely asexual person who disclosed his or her orientation to me. I'm not saying it's not valid, because I believe it certainly is an orientation, but I've been assuming it's really rare.
I really do. I think human sexuality is a lot more complicated then most people would like to believe. It could be that my friend was actually gay (something he said he considered) but was in the 'denial' stage....but he said that he didn't feel anything sexual for women or men. The last time we got together had to have been about 12 years ago -- it would be interesting to see if still feels that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 10:04 AM
 
2,195 posts, read 3,641,185 times
Reputation: 893
Quote:
Originally Posted by buildings_and_bridges View Post
Sure, it's just my perspective, but I've met quite a few people who feel the same way.

You think so? I wonder sometimes. I'm not sure that I've ever met a genuinely asexual person who disclosed his or her orientation to me. I'm not saying it's not valid, because I believe it certainly is an orientation, but I've been assuming it's really rare.
I suspect it is less rare than you believe.

Somehow, it is even more unacceptable to many folks than the rest of the sexual/***** group, don't ask me why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 10:08 AM
 
4,050 posts, read 6,140,921 times
Reputation: 1574
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
I really do. I think human sexuality is a lot more complicated then most people would like to believe.
I definitely agree! I don't like to identify as anything "-sexual," honestly, though I'm not a completley asexual person. Just much less so than most people, from what I can tell.

I also don't think the who gay/straight/bi thing is as clear-cut as many people make it out to be. I think it exists on a continuum (sp?). I wonder how many exclusively gay or straight people exist. If we don't make sexual preference the primary indicator, I think it makes even more sense. For example, my brother, who is quite adamant about his heterosexuality and susipcious of my ideas about orientations, admitted to me that he's capable of being romantically attracted to a man, but wouldn't desire sex with a man. I think that means something, even if it does mean that he would never marry a man.

Quote:
It could be that my friend was actually gay (something he said he considered) but was in the 'denial' stage....but he said that he didn't feel anything sexual for women or men. The last time we got together had to have been about 12 years ago -- it would be interesting to see if still feels that way.
That would be interesting! Everyone I've ever known personally (not just online) eventually developed sexual attraction to someone. Sometimes they were just late-bloomers and/or hadn't yet met that person who did it for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2008, 10:10 AM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,631,332 times
Reputation: 3028
Transexuals are clearly different from homosexuals. Yet they easily can clear the hurdles that homosexuals can't. They can get married. They can adopt. They can do anything a regular man or woman can do.

The only problem IMO with transexuals is when they want to blatantly display sexuality. Like a chick that now is a dude who wants to wear makeup, lipstick and earrings with his/her beard. I would not tolerate that kind of behavior as an employer. Decide what sex you want to be and present yourself as such. Work is not a place for fantasy behaviors to be carried out. Its a place to come in and do the job you were hired to do without distractions and weird behavior. I fired a guy for weird behavior who was not a transexual and not gay, so you can believe I would give equal rights to transexuals or GLB's who think weird behavior at work is fine when they have had it made clear to them it is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top