Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your "argument" is contradicting itself. Was he born in Seattle (part of America last time I checked) or was he born out of this country and then announced his birth in Hawaii? Per law his mother would be required to be a resident of Hawaii for one year before obtaining a birth certificate if born out of territory. So if you are claiming he was born in Seattle, yet obtained a Hawaiian BC, it still validates his American citizenship. If you are claiming he was born out of this country, then your argument for the Seattle non-sense thwarts that. You're running in circles here.
What I said was that his mother was living in Seattle in August of 1961.
If Obama was born in Seattle, why would he need to lie and say he was born in Hawaii?
Based on your born in Seattle premise... Why would Obama lie about being born in Hawaii if he could just as easily claim natural born citizen status if he was born in Seattle?
Have you been to the Seattle Public Library yourself or are you simply taking the
word of the author who wrote that article?
Based on your born in Seattle premise... Why would Obama lie about being born in Hawaii if he could just as easily claim natural born citizen status if he was born in Seattle?
Why is that relevant at all concerning his citizenship status?
Sorry my mistake, it was Katiana in this thread where you were spewing the same nonsense you are spewing here....Kat wrote this:
"While you think that extremely odd, you think nothing of a mom with a newborn traveling from Kenya to Hawaii to place a birth announcement? I believe Mrs. Obama was seen in Hawaii after his birth."
Interesting... I post the fact that Obama's mother and infant Obama lived in Seattle, NOT Hawaii, in August 1961 and you call that spew. But Kat posts a 'belief' and that's not spew. Hmmm...
The author:
Capitol Hill Community Council: 2008 Candidate -- Vice President -- Charlette Lefevre (http://www.capitolhillcommunitycouncil.org/charlette-lefevre - broken link)
Interesting... I post the fact that Obama's mother and infant Obama lived in Seattle, NOT Hawaii, in August 1961 and you call that spew. But Kat posts a 'belief' and that's not spew. Hmmm...
YOur fact is irrelevant to the topic at hand, though.
First you come here and insinuate the guy was born in Kenya. Now you're saying that he couldn't have been born in Hawaii and clearly must have been born in Seattle. Which one is it? What are you arguing? You need to stand up and state your case. All you are doing right now is arguing what it's not, but not saying what it is. Are you saying he was born out of this country or in this country?
Lets be honest though, the bottom line is that on all fronts the birther movement is all but defunct. This is nothing more than grasping at straws.
YOur fact is irrelevant to the topic at hand, though.
It casts doubt as to the veracity of the events surrounding his birth that Obama has released, so far.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
