Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2010, 04:49 PM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,687,105 times
Reputation: 623

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzie679 View Post
Palin, Bachmann Tea Party sessions closed to press | StarTribune.com
What are they trying to hide? This is not the way to gain credibility.
Corridinating their political efforts and figuring out how to implement plans to bring down "tax and spend big government" as we see today shouldn't included public media invitations. Why let the enemy know your strategies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2010, 04:52 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,328,091 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by TnHilltopper View Post
Received an email from a journalist friend in Nashville who was denied access. Considering he was a strong supporter of Ron Paul's Presidential campaign and is torn about remaining in a Republican Party that has abandoned traditional conservatism, its no wonder. Considering this area had a great deal of support for Paul brand conservatism, once again the right cuts off its nose to spite its face and further alienates those of its own party it doesn't see as ideologically "pure" Neoconservative.
It's a closed-door meeting. So what? It's not like he asked to join the movement and was denied. They want their own hand-picked journalists to cover their meeting and decide what, if any, information about the meeting will be released to the public. It's no different than any other private organization. The tea party is open to all who want to join its cause. No need to cry a river about being denied access to management strategy meetings.

Ask your friend to see if he can attend an ACORN meeting as a journalist and see what response he gets from them? I'm guessing a big fat GTFO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 05:10 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,978,162 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Please if you are not white and christian do not go to a tea party rally. I feel for your safety on the real. Fight them elsewhere but do not become a victim of thier hate
Why do you say that? Have you actually gone to one? I have, and saw many not white people. And I'm not a christan. In spite of what the leftwing media tried to portray, there was no need for anyone to fear for their safety. Unless you count the environmentalist who had to be escorted out for being too disruptive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 05:11 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,194,634 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
It's a closed-door meeting. So what? It's not like he asked to join the movement and was denied. They want their own hand-picked journalists to cover their meeting and decide what, if any, information about the meeting will be released to the public. It's no different than any other private organization. The tea party is open to all who want to join its cause. No need to cry a river about being denied access to management strategy meetings.

Ask your friend to see if he can attend an ACORN meeting as a journalist and see what response he gets from them? I'm guessing a big fat GTFO.
Well I can assure you that he isn't upset but that isn't the point being made and this has nothing to do with tea parties. Matt Collins who is the vice chair of the Tennessee Republican Party was only reluctantly invited due to his chairmanship. He too was a Ron Paul supporter and works for the Campaign for Liberty, which has all but been excluded.

The point is that we are witnessing puritanical ideologues trying to further distill the Republican Party, to its most, whatever they are... Nothing pleases me more personally as I think these whack job kook a doodle doo crazy nuts have wiped out any chance of this brand of crazy from gaining prominence in American politics. Hopefully after purging these nuts, some sane, rational, reasoned intellectual conservatives of a more traditional flavor will replace the kooks.

If they want to stand in a circle and compare nasal indexes on who is the most "real American" then by all means feel free, and good luck at the polls.

Democrats went through a similar thing after LBJ and so too will the Republican Party, then the pendulum will swing once again as it always does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 05:15 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,978,162 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by JefferyT View Post
I can see why they'd want a Palin speech secret, and Bachmans. They want to control the message, hence only freindly ("selected") reporters will cover this.

Sort of reminds me of the old Soviet Union under the Communists. They did stuff in secret too, and controlled the message. In fact there was a famous even in Soviet history where Kruschev gave his "Secret Speech" to a closed session of the Communist Party.

I know the Tea Party people don't like being compared to Communists, but that is what this sounds like.
Kind of like this reporter? We all know who loves Communists....

Huffington Post Covered Up Bill Clinton Affair During 2008 Presidential Campaign
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 05:31 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,698,118 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by JefferyT View Post
I can see why they'd want a Palin speech secret, and Bachmans. They want to control the message, hence only freindly ("selected") reporters will cover this.

Sort of reminds me of the old Soviet Union under the Communists. They did stuff in secret too, and controlled the message. In fact there was a famous even in Soviet history where Kruschev gave his "Secret Speech" to a closed session of the Communist Party.

I know the Tea Party people don't like being compared to Communists, but that is what this sounds like.
Seems I recall similar complaints not so long ago about who from the press was invited to WH meetings (and who was not). Now *that* would be something to get worked up over. Did you, at the time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:21 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,787 posts, read 8,030,764 times
Reputation: 6691
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002 View Post
Sounds like someone has a bitter taste in their mouth
nah i've been to a dozen tea parties in my area. nice folks represented our area well. whites,Hispanic, native American etc.sure we are armatures but we care about our collective future and know we can and will work together.we actually do care about each other and our futures and that of our children. how can that leave a bad taste in my mouth. now go spit you will feel better
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:30 PM
 
Location: La lune et les étoiles
18,258 posts, read 22,535,626 times
Reputation: 19593
Quote:
Originally Posted by parfleche View Post
nah i've been to a dozen tea parties in my area. nice folks represented our area well. whites,Hispanic, native American etc.sure we are armatures but we care about our collective future and know we can and will work together.we actually do care about each other and our futures and that of our children. how can that leave a bad taste in my mouth. now go spit you will feel better
Glad to see that these people were united in their bigotry at the "I hate Obama" meetings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:37 PM
 
Location: In The Outland
6,023 posts, read 14,069,265 times
Reputation: 3535
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzie679 View Post
Palin, Bachmann Tea Party sessions closed to press | StarTribune.com
What are they trying to hide? This is not the way to gain credibility.
Why do people who use screen names rather than their own real name expect to have credibility, by your logic !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2010, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzie679 View Post
Palin, Bachmann Tea Party sessions closed to press | StarTribune.com
What are they trying to hide? This is not the way to gain credibility.
Wonder how upset they are at StarTribune.com that time after time the democrats held health care bill meetings in secret, or if their panties were in a wad over 0bama not pushing for C-SPAN to be allowed at any of those meetings?

Who cares? Its a private group, they have no requirement or obligation to allow the press to attend any of their meetings, its not like they are making secret plans to spend trillions in US taxpayer money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top