Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ooops. The page you are trying to reach could not be found. Is it possible you typed the URL in wrong? Or perhaps the link you clicked in an email wrapped to the next line?
But Obama claimed it would be on .gov websites, not Chicago now blogs...
Ooops. The page you are trying to reach could not be found. Is it possible you typed the URL in wrong? Or perhaps the link you clicked in an email wrapped to the next line?
But Obama claimed it would be on .gov websites, not Chicago now blogs...
COMMITTEE ON RULES - H.R. 4872 - Reconciliation Act of 2010 (http://www.rules.house.gov/bills_details.aspx?NewsID=4606 - broken link)
Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a law.
COMMITTEE ON RULES - H.R. 4872 - Reconciliation Act of 2010 (http://www.rules.house.gov/bills_details.aspx?NewsID=4606 - broken link)
"IN GENERAL.—Subject to subclause (II), in the case of taxable years beginning in any calendar year after 2014, the initial and final applicable percentages under clause (i) (asin effect for the preceding calendar year after application of this clause) shall be adjusted to reflect the excess of the rate of premium growth for the preceding calendar year over the rate of income growth for the preceding calendar year.‘‘(II) ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT.—Except as provided in subclause (III), in the case of any calendar year after 2018, the percentages described in subclause (I) shall,in addition to the adjustment under subclause (I), be adjusted to reflect the excess (if any) of the rate of premium growth estimated under subclause (I) for the preceding calendar year over the rate of growth in the consumer price index for the preceding calendar year."
health care bill is online. It's not "hidden away behind closed doors."
The crafting of the bill certainly was.
Where have you been for the last year?
You conveniently forgot this passage;
Quote:
But in all such cases the votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House respectively.
If they use the Slaughter rule, they won't be "voting" on the bill, they will "deem" it passed. That ok with you?
"IN GENERAL.—Subject to subclause (II), in the case of taxable years beginning in any calendar year after 2014, the initial and final applicable percentages under clause (i) (asin effect for the preceding calendar year after application of this clause) shall be adjusted to reflect the excess of the rate of premium growth for the preceding calendar year over the rate of income growth for the preceding calendar year.‘‘(II) ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENT.—Except as provided in subclause (III), in the case of any calendar year after 2018, the percentages described in subclause (I) shall,in addition to the adjustment under subclause (I), be adjusted to reflect the excess (if any) of the rate of premium growth estimated under subclause (I) for the preceding calendar year over the rate of growth in the consumer price index for the preceding calendar year."
Anyone seen John Conyer's lawyers?
Back when my boyfriend was taking his actuarial exams I used to help him study. That's what this language reminds me of. I don't understand it, and I don't want to understand it. I'd like a translated version.
Back when my boyfriend was taking his actuarial exams I used to help him study. That's what this language reminds me of. I don't understand it, and I don't want to understand it. I'd like a translated version.
Hahaha, those sneaky Democrats!
But dont you worry lizjo, Glenn and Rush are there to translate it for you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
