Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So says Jon Eisenberg, the lawyer who won a landmark decision against the government in Northern California's U.S. District Court Wednesday on a wiretapping case.
Eisenberg told SF Weekly that government lawyers working for Obama had been "more strident" than those working for Bush, refusing to let him see important federal documents related to the case even after he was approved for a top-secret security clearance.
"Even though I have the security clearance, I don't have the 'need to know,' so I can't see anything," Eisenberg said. "This is Obama. Obama! Mr. Transparency! Mr. Change! It's exactly what Bush would have done."
Don't tell me you're another that was duped by that load of BS, Mr. Eisenberg.
So says Jon Eisenberg, the lawyer who won a landmark decision against the government in Northern California's U.S. District Court Wednesday on a wiretapping case.
So, in his own words this lawyer says "I don't have the 'need to know' " and we're supposed to be upset he isn't shown secret documents?
Just another baseless bash Obama whine, the sour grape vine continues to yield a bumper crop.
Of course you have misconstrued what he said.
According to the obama administration, he doesn't have a "need to know", even though the court has given him classified clearance.
Of course, the leftists will attempt to dismiss this controversy, just like all the rest. Imagine that, when the Left used to rail and gnash their teeth about the "abuses" of Bush, you have a lawyer that just won a wiretapping case saying that obama is actually worse than bush, and what do we get? Ho-hum.
Now dont bring up how much Obama is similar to Bush we cant have that. We must keep believing that Obama is not like Bush
Thanks for sharing the article
Funny, I actually recall something totally different on these threads. When we do make the correlation between Bush and Obama, we're told this is NOT ABOUT BUSH...Bush is no longer President yada yada yada
According to the obama administration, he doesn't have a "need to know", even though the court has given him classified clearance.
Of course, the leftists will attempt to dismiss this controversy, just like all the rest. Imagine that, when the Left used to rail and gnash their teeth about the "abuses" of Bush, you have a lawyer that just won a wiretapping case saying that obama is actually worse than bush, and what do we get? Ho-hum.
Your clairvoyance stick is broken...but thanks for trying to speak for left, yet again since you haven't spoken to every person on the left, you would be once again WRONG.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackandproud
Funny, I actually recall something totally different on these threads. When we do make the correlation between Bush and Obama, we're told this is NOT ABOUT BUSH...Bush is no longer President yada yada yada
That depends on whether you're hearing the flip or the flop side of the NeoConfused policy
Your clairvoyance stick is broken...but thanks for trying to speak for left, yet again since you haven't spoken to every person on the left, you would be once again WRONG.
On this board, I'm right on the money.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
