Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You don't seem to understand is that AT&T is more than rich people in suits. They have a bunch of regular people supporting their families. There are probably people who have retired from the company who now get health benefits that will no longer receive them after the fees begin to take effect.
And the vast majority of those you speak of are covered by union contracts that do not expire until 2012. No change can be made before then, and any change made then will have to be negotiated through the union. Given that the actual costs to AT&T for these benefits are trivial, the union side is not so likely to be impressed by the company's crocodile tears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC
No tears from me either - just an intense stare.
Maybe you should be practicing that in front of a mirror.
You don't seem to understand is that AT&T is more than rich people in suits. They have a bunch of regular people supporting their families. There are probably people who have retired from the company who now get health benefits that will no longer receive them after the fees begin to take effect.
No tears from me either - just an intense stare.
They've screwed their employees left and right over the past 15 years.
They've cut their employees and retirees health care over and over again.
They've shipped tons of I.T. jobs overseas.
And that's just the non-union workers.
Some union jobs they keep switching from state to state - to get to lower rates. Move a east coast call center to the midwest (the employees can follow, at a pay cut), then move it to the south a few years later. No union jobs, more profit. Yup they care.
AT&T previously received a tax-free benefit from the government to subsidize health-care costs for retirees, who would otherwise be on a Medicare Part D plan. Under the new bill, AT&T will no longer be able to deduct that subsidy.
“As a result of this legislation, including the additional tax burden, AT&T will be evaluating prospective changes to the active and retiree health-care benefits offered by the company,” the carrier said in the filing.
Apparently, under Bush, the government offered tax incentives for businesses to take on the costs of supplying prescription drugs in their retirement plans to their employees, thereby relieving the federal Medicare Part D from having to cover the costs. Now the government is taxing them on this, so companies will be dropping their prescription drug coverage from their retirement plans, forcing more people onto the government plan. So much for keeping costs down.
Not quite. The republican congress and Bush, introduced (tax free) subsidies to corporations ($1300/retiree per year) and on top of that, these subsidies were tax deductible too. Talk about plutonomy at work. Now that they get "only subsidies", the plutocrats are whining and crying and their sheeple propagating their "message".
Oh, and to quote Milton Friedman... "The best way to restore freedom of choice to both patient and physician and to control costs would be to eliminate the tax exemption of employer-provided medical care"
But I think, y'all are not looking for the best solution, but the best "political solution". Besides, Milton was merely pro-market, not necessarily pro-business.
Not quite. The republican congress and Bush, introduced (tax free) subsidies to corporations ($1300/retiree per year) and on top of that, these subsidies were tax deductible too. Talk about plutonomy at work. Now that they get "only subsidies", the plutocrats are whining and crying and their sheeple propagating their "message".
Oh, and to quote Milton Friedman... "The best way to restore freedom of choice to both patient and physician and to control costs would be to eliminate the tax exemption of employer-provided medical care"
But I think, y'all are not looking for the best solution, but the best "political solution". Besides, Milton was merely pro-market, not necessarily pro-business.
Numbers vary depending on source. Here is an article on the subject. Regardless, do you support tax free subsidy to be also tax deductible?
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan
But this is what you wanted..you wanted health care separated from big business and not tied to employment. So now it will be tied to the government.
Ideal would be to keep employer out of the picture when it comes to providing health care insurance. A good solution would be a single payer system, but I bet you won't like it as it doesn't serve the masters well.
Numbers vary depending on source. Here is an article on the subject. Regardless, do you support tax free subsidy to be also tax deductible?
I read that it was a subsidy with a tax credit which in effect zero'd out their tax liability.
It was done so that those retirees would not flood the medicare system.
If the government gave me money to keep my retirees and let me take a tax credit for it.that's a zero tax liability to me..isn't it ?
And it should be if the government asked me to do it.
At least the money is accountable since companies have to keep certified books.
They've been doing it since 2003..7 years and no one complained.
$650 to the company or spend $1200 to do it yourself.
I read that it was a subsidy with a tax credit which in effect zero'd out their tax liability.
It was done so that those retirees would not flood the medicare system.
If the government gave me money to keep my retirees and let me take a tax credit for it.that's a zero tax liability to me..isn't it ?
And it should be if the government asked me to do it.
At least the money is accountable since companies have to keep certified books.
They've been doing it since 2003..7 years and no one complained.
$650 to the company or spend $1200 to do it yourself.
You will find out soon enough as those CEOs are grilled on the subject. Do tune into C-Span for first hand experience though, please not on CNN or FoxNews.
Besides, do you agree with Milton Friedman's "best pro-market solution" I quoted earlier?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.